Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901364›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2020

Giving and receiving social support in online substance use disorder forums: How self-efficacy moderates effects on relapse.

Yan Liu, Rachel Kornfield, Bret R Shaw, Dhavan V Shah, Fiona McTavish, David H Gustafson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Framing Helper Therapy to Support User Engagement: Causal Evidence from a Public Deployment of a Mental Health Support Text Messaging Program.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  7. The Impact of Peer-Based Recovery Support Services: Mediating Factors of Client Outcomes.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spiritual Awakening in 12-Step Recovery: Impact Among Residential Aftercare Residents.Spirituality in clinical practice (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan LiuSchool of Journalism & Communication, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200072, China. Electronic address: yliu680@shu.edu.cn.
Rachel KornfieldDepartment of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Bret R ShawDepartment of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Dhavan V ShahSchool of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Fiona McTavishCenter for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
David H GustafsonCenter for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Funding

Technology Enabled Services for Coordinated Care of Depression in Healthcare SettingsP50MH119029 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DAVID CURTIS MOHR, Jessica Lee Schleider · 2020 to 2026
$10.7M
Contextualized daily prediction of lapse risk in opioid use disorder by digital phenotypingR01DA047315 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CURTIN, JOHN J., SHAH, DHAVAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Implementing Technology-Assisted Drug Treatment and relapse prevention in FQHCsR01DA034279 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H, MARSCH, LISA A. · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Multidisciplinary Training Program in Digital Mental HealthT32MH115882 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Darren Gergle, DAVID CURTIS MOHR · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034279NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047315NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119029NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividuals in recovery for substance use disorders (SUDs) increasingly use online social support forums, necessitating research on how communicating through these forums can affect recovery. This study examines how giving and receiving support within an SUDs recovery forum predict substance use, and considers whether effects vary according to participants' self-efficacy.

methodsWe applied content analysis to 3440 messages that were posted by 231 participants in an online SUDs forum. Surveys assessed social support reception and substance use at three timepoints. We assessed relationships between giving and receiving support and substance use (risky drinking days, illicit drug use days), and the interactions between self-efficacy and social support in predicting substance use outcomes.

resultsReceiving more emotional support was associated with reduced illicit drug use at 6 and 12 months. For those with low self-efficacy, giving more emotional support predicted less risky drinking at month 12, whereas giving more informational support predicted more risky drinking at month 12.

conclusionThese results suggest conditional benefits of exchanging support in an online SUDs forum, depending upon type of support (informational versus emotional), the participants' role (giver or receiver), and their self-efficacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We discuss implications for designing and using peer-to-peer support platforms.

Indexed as

Self EfficacySocial SupportSubstance-Related DisordersChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInternetMaleRecurrenceSecondary PreventionEmotional support receptionOnline support groupsSelf-efficacySocial support expressionSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID31901364
PMCPMC7253337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.