Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901252›Full record

ReviewCell stem cell2020

Toward the Goal of Human Heart Regeneration.

Hesham Sadek, Eric N Olson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stem cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Signaling pathways regulating cardiac regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hesham SadekDepartment of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Electronic address: hesham.sadek@utsouthwestern.edu.
Eric N OlsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Electronic address: eric.olson@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

Training CoreP50HD087351 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASSEL-DUBY, RHONDA, IANNACCONE, SUSAN T · 2020 to 2024
$8.0M
Deciphering the role of a novel micropeptide in cardiac function and dysfunctionR01HL130253 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASSEL-DUBY, RHONDA, OLSON, ERIC N · 2016 to 2023
$4.4M
Metabolic Control by Myogenic MicroRNAs, Mediator and MyokinesR01DK099653 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASSEL-DUBY, RHONDA, OLSON, ERIC N · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
Molecular Dissection of Myoblast Fusion In Muscle Development and RegenerationR01AR067294 · NIAMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASSEL-DUBY, RHONDA, OLSON, ERIC N · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Calcineurin Regulates Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle Through Meis1 and Hoxb13R01HL147276 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SADEK, HESHAM · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130253NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL147276NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067294NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD087351NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart regeneration, a relatively new field of biology, is one of the most active and controversial areas of biomedical research. The potential impact of successful human heart regeneration therapeutics cannot be overstated, given the magnitude and prognosis of heart failure. However, the regenerative process is highly complex, and premature claims of successful heart regeneration have both fueled interest and created controversy. The field as a whole is now in the process of course correction, and a clearer picture is beginning to emerge. Despite the challenges, fundamental principles in developmental biology have provided a framework for hypothesis-driven approaches toward the ultimate goal of adult heart regeneration and repair. In this review, we discuss the current state of the field and outline the potential paths forward toward regenerating the human myocardium.

Indexed as

GoalsRegenerative MedicineHeartHumansMyocardium

Identifiers

PMID31901252
PMCPMC7257208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.