Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901238›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2020

In vitro antifungal resistance profile of Candida strains isolated from Saudi women suffering from vulvovaginitis.

Mohamed T Yassin, Ashraf A Mostafa, Abdulaziz A Al-Askar, Rashad Bdeer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cross-sectional investigation of mycological diagnosis challenges in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. High incidence of azole resistance amongCurrent medical mycology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed T YassinBotany and Microbiology Dept., College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. mohamed.yassin.ah2016@gmail.com.
Ashraf A MostafaBotany and Microbiology Dept., College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz A Al-AskarBotany and Microbiology Dept., College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Rashad BdeerMicrobiology Department, Regional Laboratory at King Saud Medical City, P.O. 2897, Riyadh, 11196, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) represents a universal health hazard that contributes to significant morbidity in women. Resistance of Candida to antifungal therapy has been reported as a public health problem. So, the objective of our current study is to detect resistance profile of different candidal strains.

methodsIn this study, isolated Candida strains were identified by conventional methods, confirmed by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing, and phylogenetically analyzed with reference strains in GenBank. Also, sensitivity of different Candida strains to common antifungal agents was evaluated by disc diffusion method.

resultsCandida albicans was identified as the most frequent strain (63%) followed by non-albicans strains, such as C. glabrata (20%), C. tropicalis (13%), and C. krusei (4%). Sensitivity of Candida strains (C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata) to commonly used antifungal agents was evaluated through the disc diffusion method. C. glabrata was the most resistant strain and considered to be a multidrug-resistant pathogen, while both, C. albicans and C. tropicalis showed high susceptibility to terbinafine. In contrast, C. albicans showed resistance to fluconazole, clotrimazole, and nystatin, while C. tropicalis, considered as the most sensitive strain, was susceptible to all the antifungal agents tested except nystatin. Terbinafine was the most effective antifungal agent against both C. tropicalis and C. albicans, and hence its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) for C. albicans and C. tropicalis were evaluated. MICs of terbinafine against C. albicans and C. tropicalis were 5 μg/ml and 2.5 μg/ml, while their MFCs were 10 μg/ml and 5 μg/ml, respectively.

conclusionThe emergence of resistant Candida strains necessitates conduction of the antifungal susceptibility test prior to deciding the medication regime.

Indexed as

AdultAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSaudi ArabiaVulvovaginitisAntifungal AgentsAntifungal agentsCandida vaginitisPhylogenetic analysisResistance

Identifiers

PMID31901238
PMCPMC6942276
OpenAlexW2997926091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.