Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901171›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2020

Combining molecular and imaging metrics in cancer: radiogenomics.

Roberto Lo Gullo, Isaac Daimiel, Elizabeth A Morris, Katja Pinker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of Radiomics to Predict Disease Recurrence in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Roberto Lo GulloDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA. logullor@mskcc.org.
Isaac DaimielDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Elizabeth A MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-7331
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme NABreast Cancer Research Foundation NAEuropean School of Radiology NAFundación Alfonso Martín Escudero NAHorizon 2020 Framework Programme NANCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Susan G. Komen NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiogenomics is the extension of radiomics through the combination of genetic and radiomic data. Because genetic testing remains expensive, invasive, and time-consuming, and thus unavailable for all patients, radiogenomics may play an important role in providing accurate imaging surrogates which are correlated with genetic expression, thereby serving as a substitute for genetic testing. MAIN BODY: In this article, we define the meaning of radiogenomics and the difference between radiomics and radiogenomics. We provide an up-to-date review of the radiomics and radiogenomics literature in oncology, focusing on breast, brain, gynecological, liver, kidney, prostate and lung malignancies. We also discuss the current challenges to radiogenomics analysis.

conclusionRadiomics and radiogenomics are promising to increase precision in diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and prediction of treatment response, providing valuable information for patient care throughout the course of the disease, given that this information is easily obtainable with imaging. Larger prospective studies and standardization will be needed to define relevant imaging biomarkers before they can be implemented into the clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Molecular profilingPrecision medicineRadiogenomicsRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID31901171
PMCPMC6942081
OpenAlexW3004757234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.