Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901133›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

The prognostic value of the tumor-stroma ratio is most discriminative in patients with grade III or triple-negative breast cancer.

Kiki M H Vangangelt, Andrew R Green, Isabelle M F Heemskerk, Danielle Cohen, Gabi W van Pelt, Marcelo Sobral-Leite, Marjanka K Schmidt, Hein Putter, Emad A Rakha, Rob A E M Tollenaar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Targeting breast tumor extracellular matrix and stroma utilizing nanoparticles.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kiki M H VangangeltDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-4691
Andrew R GreenNottingham Breast Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Isabelle M F HeemskerkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Danielle CohenDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gabi W van PeltDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1449-7348
Marcelo Sobral-LeiteDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Emad A RakhaNottingham Breast Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rob A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wilma E MeskerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) was evaluated as a promising parameter for breast cancer prognostication in clinically relevant subgroups of patients. The TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides of 1,794 breast cancer patients from the Nottingham City Hospital. An independent second cohort of 737 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Institute to Antoni van Leeuwenhoek was used for evaluation. In the Nottingham Breast Cancer series, the TSR was an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.66, p = 0.004). The interaction term was statistically significant for grade and triple-negative status. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a more pronounced effect of the TSR for RFS in grade III tumors (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43-2.51, p < 0.001) and triple-negative tumors (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.14, p = 0.020). Comparable hazard ratios and confidence intervals were observed for grade and triple-negative status in the ONCOPOOL study. The prognostic value of TSR was not modified by age, tumor size, histology, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status or lymph node status. In conclusion, patients with a stroma-high tumor had a worse prognosis compared to patients with a stroma-low tumor. The prognostic value of the TSR is most discriminative in grade III tumors and triple-negative tumors. The TSR was not modified by other clinically relevant parameters making it a potential factor to be included for improved risk stratification.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNetherlandsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsStromal CellsTriple Negative Breast Neoplasmsbreast cancergradeprognosistriple-negative statustumor-stroma ratio

Identifiers

PMID31901133
PMCPMC7065011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.