ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2020
MGUS Predicts Worse Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- GLP-1 RA Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Cardiovascular Significance; Current Evidence and Novel Insights.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a retrospective cohort study to analyze all 87 CAD patients with MGUS and 178 CAD patients without MGUS admitted in Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University from 2015 to 2017. Patients were followed up via regular patient visits or telephone, and the median follow-up period was 2.9 years. The end point of follow-up was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). CAD patients with MGUS had a higher risk of MACE than those without MGUS (log-rank P = 0.0015). After adjustment for other markers in the stepwise Cox regression model, MGUS was still related to the increasing risk of MACE incident (P = 0.002, HR = 2.308). Then, we constructed the nomogram based on the Cox regression model, and the concordance index (C-index) was 0.667. Hence, MGUS might be added into the risk model of CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.