Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900886›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2020

Expression Analysis of lncRNAs in Refractory and Non-Refractory Epileptic Patients.

Sara Mirzajani, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi, Shahram Arsang-Jang, Mir Davood Omrani, Seyed Sohrab Hashemi Fesharaki, Arezou Sayad, Mohammad Taheri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A pilot study on identifying gene signatures as markers for predicting patient response to antiseizure medications.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Altered ANRIL Methylation in Epileptic Patients.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara MirzajaniDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soudeh Ghafouri-FardDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jafar Mehvari HabibabadiIsfahan Neuroscience Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shahram Arsang-JangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Mir Davood OmraniDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Sohrab Hashemi FesharakiPars Advanced and Minimally Invasive Medical Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arezou SayadDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ar.sayad@yahoo.com.
Mohammad TaheriUrogenital Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammad_823@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-0591
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRQom University of Medical Science and Health Services · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders such as epilepsy. In the current study, we evaluated expression of eight lncRNAs in 80 epileptic patients (40 refractory and 40 non-refractory ones) and 40 normal individual using quantitative real-time PCR. Bayesian regression model showed significant higher expression of UCA1 in both refractory and non-refractory groups compared with controls (posterior beta of relative expression (RE) = 2.03, P value = 0.003, and posterior beta of RE = 4.05, P value < 0.0001, respectively). Besides, expression of UCA1 was higher in non-refractory patients compared with refractory ones (posterior beta of RE = 2.008, P value = 0.019). When repeating statistical analyses in a gender-based manner, differences in expression of UCA1 were significant in all subgroup analyses except for male non-refractory vs. refractory subgroups analysis. Expression levels of NKILA and ANRIL were higher in both refractory and non-refractory groups compared with controls (posterior beta of RE = 1.565, P value = 0.018, and posterior beta of RE = 1.902, P value = 0.006 for NKILA; posterior beta of RE = 1.304, P value < 0.0001, and posterior beta of RE = 1.603, P value = 0.019 for ANRIL, respectively). However, expression levels of these two lncRNAs were not different between refractory and non-refractory groups. Gender-based analysis for these two lncRNAs revealed similar results except for lack of difference in ANRIL expression between male refractory group and controls. Expression of THRIL was significantly lower in both refractory and non-refractory groups compared with controls (posterior beta of RE = - 0.842, P value = 0.044 and posterior beta of RE = - 1.969, P value < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, expression of this lncRNA was lower in non-refractory patients compared with refractory ones (posterior beta of RE = - 1.129, P value = 0.002). However, no significant difference was detected between non-refractory and refractory patients either in males or females. The interactions between gender and relative expressions of PACER, DILC, and MALAT1 were significant, so the results were assessed in gender-based manner. In females, expression of DILC was higher in non-refractory patients compared with refractory ones (posterior beta of RE = 0.959, P value = 0.044). Expression of MALAT1 was lower in female non-refractory patients compared with controls and in female non-refractory patients compared with refractory ones (posterior beta of RE = - 1.35, P value = 0.002, and posterior beta of RE = - 0.942, P value = 0.045, respectively). Finally, expression of PACER was higher in refractory patients vs. controls and non-refractory patients vs. controls in both male and female subgroups. However, comparison between non-refractory and refractory patients revealed significant results only among females. Expression of none of the assessed lncRNAs was correlated with age of study participants. There were robust correlations between expression levels of lncRNAs. The most robust correlations were detected between UCA1 and PACER (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001) and between UCA1 and ANRIL (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). Taken together, our study demonstrated dysregulation of lncRNAs in peripheral blood of epileptic patients and potentiated them as biomarkers for this neurologic condition.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersDrug Resistant EpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkersCDKN2B antisense RNA, humanlong noncoding RNA NKILA, humanMALAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, Long NoncodingUCA1 RNA, humanANRILDILCEpilepsyMALAT1NKILAPACERRefractoryTHRILUCA1

Identifiers

PMID31900886
OpenAlexW2997769432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.