Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900869›Full record

Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2020

The effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF treatment.

In Hwan Hong, Wonseok Choi, Jae Ryong Han

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

In Hwan HongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Wonseok ChoiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Jae Ryong HanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. scarpel@hallym.or.kr.
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of primary intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in eyes affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. STUDY

designRetrospective observational study

methodsThe medical records of patients who attended our clinic from March 2013 to September 2018 with refractory macular were reviewed. We included the patients who were injected at least one IVTA and completed 6 months of observation. Best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events (AEs) were examined at baseline and at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months.

resultsSixty-four eyes of 54 subjects were included. The mean VA was improved significantly at all time points compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.0001), with the greatest mean improvement at 1 month (0.3 logMAR). The reduction in mean CMT was also significant at all follow-up examinations compared to baseline (P < 0.0001), with the greatest decrease at 1 month (113.68 ± 53.78 μm). A poorer VA before injection was a factor that influenced visual gain 1 month post treatment (0.247 logMAR units/unit increase in baseline VA, P = 0.006). The most common AE associated with IVTA treatment was elevated IOP (11 eyes), observed significantly more often after IVTA injections containing a preservative (25.8%) than after those that were preservative-free (9.1%) (P = 0.033).

conclusionIVTA injection can be an alternative steroid treatment for DME refractory to anti-VEGF therapy.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansIntraocular PressureIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabGlucocorticoidsRanibizumabTriamcinolone AcetonideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ADiabetic macular edemaIVTARefractory DME

Identifiers

PMID31900869
OpenAlexW2997680450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.