ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020
King Richard III revisited.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic examination of skeletal remains exhumed in 2012 from the site of the former Church of the Greyfriars in Leicester, United Kingdom, revealed a gracile adult male of around 30 to 34 years of age with 11 perimortem injuries. These were consistent with descriptions of injuries sustained by King Richard III, the last Plantagenet King of England, at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. Combining these features with DNA analyses proved that the remains were those of Richard. The finding of a severe thoracic scoliosis with a raised right shoulder confirmed that the king did have a" hunchback" which was not a later invention of Tudor and subsequent chroniclers. This investigation provides an excellent demonstration of how contemporary forensic techniques can answer historical questions. The remains of the last Plantagenet king have been identified, his vertebral disease confirmed, and the nature of his last moments verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.