ArticleImmunologic research2019
Retained or altered expression of major histocompatibility complex class I in patient-derived xenograft models in breast cancer.
Article in Immunologic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) in tumor cells is regulated by interferon signaling, and it is an important factor in the efficacy of cytotoxic T cell-dependent immunotherapy. To determine the impact of immune cells in MHC I expression on tumor cells, we compared the expression of MHC I in tumor cells derived from primary breast cancers and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. MHC I and myxovirus resistance gene A (MxA) expression were analyzed using immunohistochemistry in 23 cases of tumor tissue and corresponding primary and secondary PDXs. The median H score of MHC I was 210 (0-300) in patient tumor tissues, 197.5 (0-300) in primary PDX tumors, and 157.5 (5-300) in secondary PDX tumors. Cases were divided into four groups based on the difference in MHC I expression between the patient tumor tissues and secondary PDXs. Eleven cases constituted the high MHC I group, four constituted the low MHC I group, six comprised the decreased MHC I group, and two comprised the increased MHC I group. MHC I and MxA expressions in each tumor were weakly correlated within patients' tumors, while strongly correlated within PDX models. Retained or altered expression of MHC I in breast cancer PDXs reveals the presence of intrinsic and extrinsic interferon signaling pathways in tumor cells. Thus, considering MHC I expression in PDX is important when using PDX models to evaluate the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in a preclinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.