Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900763›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study.

Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Annette de Thurah, Jakob Christensen, Kirsten Lomborg, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Jesper Medom Vestergaard, Trine Nøhr Winding, Karin Biering, Niels Henrik Hjollund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From framework to practice: applying the proteus-practice framework to learn lessons for integrating PROs in clinical care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Do non-responders of a geriatric screening questionnaire face lower one-year survival compared to responders? A retrospective cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in chronic and malignant diseases: ten years' experience with PRO-algorithm-based patient-clinician interaction (telePRO) in AmbuFlex.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liv Marit Valen SchougaardAmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark. livschou@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-2569
Annette de ThurahDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-4328
Jakob ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-6435
Kirsten LomborgDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-3508
Helle Terkildsen MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-7254
Caroline Trillingsgaard MejdahlAmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6082
Jesper Medom VestergaardDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.
Trine Nøhr WindingDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-0403
Karin BieringDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7038-9566
Niels Henrik HjollundAmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-6597
Aarhus University · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DK

Funding

Aarhus Universitet Not accapableRegion Midtjylland Not accapableTrygFonden 111607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined the association between sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants and referral to a new model of health care that uses patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures for remote outpatient follow-up (PRO-based follow-up).

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study among outpatients with epilepsy at the Department of Neurology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Included were all persons aged ≥ 15 years visiting the department for the first time during the period from May 2016 to May 2018. Patients received a questionnaire containing questions about health literacy, self-efficacy, patient activation, well-being, and general health. We also collected data regarding sociodemographic status, labour market affiliation, and co-morbidity from nationwide registers. Associations were analysed as time-to-event using the pseudo-value approach. Missing data were handled using multiple imputations.

resultsA total of 802 eligible patients were included in the register-based analyses and 411 patients (51%) responded to the questionnaire. The results based on data from registers indicated that patients were less likely to be referred to PRO-based follow-up if they lived alone, had low education or household income, received temporary or permanent social benefits, or if they had a psychiatric diagnosis. The results based on data from the questionnaire indicated that patients were less likely to be referred to PRO-based follow-up if they reported low levels of health literacy, self-efficacy, patient activation, well-being, or general health.

conclusionBoth self-reported and register-based analyses indicated that socioeconomically advantaged patients were referred more often to PRO-based follow-up than socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSocial ClassAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDenmarkEpilepsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth LiteracyHealth StatusHumansMaleMental DisordersAmbulatory careCohort studyOutpatient clinics, hospitalPatient-reported outcome measuresReferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID31900763
PMCPMC7190685
OpenAlexW2997711300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.