Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900736›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021

Deep brain stimulation for myoclonus dystonia syndrome: a meta-analysis with individual patient data.

Xin Wang, Xinguang Yu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Genetics Pearl for Counseling Patients with Epsilon-Sarcoglycan Myoclonus-Dystonia.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. GPi-DBS forMovement disorders clinical practice · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Combined dystonias: clinical and genetic updates.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  17. Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin WangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xinguang YuSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. xinguang_yu301@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-6529
Nankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good outcomes have been reported in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for myoclonus-dystonia syndrome (M-D), a heritable disease characterized by childhood-onset myoclonic jerks and dystonia in the upper body. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes consecutively, compare the stimulation targets, and identify potential prognostic factors. A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary outcome was the percent improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) scores for dystonia and Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) scores for myoclonus at the last follow-up visit. BFMDRS-disability scores of the patients were also summarized. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to identify the myoclonus and dystonia outcome predictors. Thirty-one studies reporting 71 patients were included. There were significant improvements in BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-disability scores in each time category and at the last follow-up visit. Mean improvement (%) in UMRS was 79.5 ± 18.2, and 94.1% of the patients showed > 50% improvement in UMRS scores at the last follow-up visit. There was a significant trend toward improved myoclonus outcome with older age at onset and shorter disease duration. Most of the adverse events were mild and transient, and pallidal stimulation seemed to be better with respect to fewer stimulation-induced events. Based on the current data, DBS is effective for even the severe M-D. Surgery at an early stage may predict a better outcome. Although targets do not serve as the outcome predictors, pallidal stimulation may be preferred due to fewer stimulation-induced events.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystonic DisordersGlobus PallidusHumansTreatment OutcomeDeep brain stimulationGlobus pallidus internusIndividual patient dataMeta-analysisMyoclonus dystonia syndromePredictive factorsVentral intermediate nucleus

Identifiers

PMID31900736
OpenAlexW2997042509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.