Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900680›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2020

In Vivo Stability of Therapeutic Proteins.

Joachim Schuster, Atanas Koulov, Hanns-Christian Mahler, Pascal Detampel, Joerg Huwyler, Satish Singh, Roman Mathaes

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A novelmAbs · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Development of a Synthetic Biosensor for Chemical Exchange MRI UtilizingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of N-Linked Glycosylation on Therapeutic Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Transferrin Aptamers Increase theBioconjugate chemistry · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  20. Intrinsic physicochemical profile of marketed antibody-based biotherapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joachim SchusterLonza AG, Drug Product Services, Basel, Switzerland.
Atanas KoulovLonza AG, Drug Product Services, Basel, Switzerland.
Hanns-Christian MahlerLonza AG, Drug Product Services, Basel, Switzerland.
Pascal DetampelDivision of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joerg HuwylerDivision of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Satish SinghLonza AG, Drug Product Services, Basel, Switzerland.
Roman MathaesLonza AG, Drug Product Services, Basel, Switzerland. roman.mathaes@lonza.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant efforts are made to characterize molecular liabilities and degradation of the drug substance (DS) and drug product (DP) during various product life-cycle stages. The in vivo fate of a therapeutic protein is usually only considered in terms of pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs). However, the environment in the human body differs substantially from that of the matrix (formulation) of the DP and may impact on the stability of an injected therapeutic protein. Stabilizing excipients used in protein formulations are expected to undergo more rapid distribution and dissociation in vivo, compared to a protein as a highly charged macromolecule. Thus, in vivo stability may significantly differ from shelf-life stability. In vivo degradation of the therapeutic protein may alter efficacy and/or safety characteristics such as immunogenicity. Studying the stability of a therapeutic protein in the intended body compartment can de-risk drug development in early stages of development by improving the selection of better clinical lead molecules. This review assesses the considerations when aiming to evaluate the in vivo fate of a therapeutic protein by comparing the physiology of relevant human body compartments and assessing their potential implications on the stability of a therapeutic protein. Moreover, we discuss the limitations of current experimental approaches mimicking physiologic conditions, depending on the desired route of administration, such as intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), intravitreal (IVT), or intrathecal (IT) administration(s). New models more closely mimicking the relevant physiologic environment and updated analytical methods are required to understand the in vivo fate of therapeutic proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug StabilityExcipientsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsExcipientsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsdevelopabilityhuman body fluidsin vitro modelin vivo protein stabilitytherapeutic protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.