ReviewPharmaceutical research2020
In Vivo Stability of Therapeutic Proteins.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evasins: Biology and Therapeutic Potential of Broad-Spectrum Chemokine Inhibitors.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Review
- Dynamic versus Static In Vitro Drug Release Testing of Subcutaneous Implants with Distinct Microstructures.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Construction of artificial organellesChemical science · 2025Review
- A novelmAbs · 2025Article
- ProGraphTrans: multimodal dynamic collaborative framework for protein representation learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Protein-Based Degraders: From Chemical Biology Tools to Neo-Therapeutics.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- In vitro Stability Study of a Panel of Commercial Antibodies at Physiological pH and Temperature as a Guide to Screen Biologic Candidate Molecules for the Potential Risk of In vivo Asparagine Deamidation and Activity Loss.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Suborgan Level Quantitation of Proteins in Tissues Delivered by Polymeric Nanocarriers.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Degradable and Multifunctional PEG-Based Hydrogels Formed by iEDDA Click Chemistry with Stable Click-Induced Supramolecular Interactions.Macromolecules · 2024Article
- Stabilization challenges and aggregation in protein-based therapeutics in the pharmaceutical industry.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Development of a Synthetic Biosensor for Chemical Exchange MRI UtilizingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Structure-Based Optimization of Antibody-Based Biotherapeutics for Improved Developability: A Practical Guide for Molecular Modelers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Impact of N-Linked Glycosylation on Therapeutic Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Transferrin Aptamers Increase theBioconjugate chemistry · 2022Article
- Pre-Clinical In-Vitro Studies on Parameters Governing Immune Complex Formation.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Disclosing the Potential of Fluorinated Ionic Liquids as Interferon-Alpha 2b Delivery Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison between Nanoparticle Encapsulation and Surface Loading for Lysosomal Enzyme Replacement Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Intrinsic physicochemical profile of marketed antibody-based biotherapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant efforts are made to characterize molecular liabilities and degradation of the drug substance (DS) and drug product (DP) during various product life-cycle stages. The in vivo fate of a therapeutic protein is usually only considered in terms of pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs). However, the environment in the human body differs substantially from that of the matrix (formulation) of the DP and may impact on the stability of an injected therapeutic protein. Stabilizing excipients used in protein formulations are expected to undergo more rapid distribution and dissociation in vivo, compared to a protein as a highly charged macromolecule. Thus, in vivo stability may significantly differ from shelf-life stability. In vivo degradation of the therapeutic protein may alter efficacy and/or safety characteristics such as immunogenicity. Studying the stability of a therapeutic protein in the intended body compartment can de-risk drug development in early stages of development by improving the selection of better clinical lead molecules. This review assesses the considerations when aiming to evaluate the in vivo fate of a therapeutic protein by comparing the physiology of relevant human body compartments and assessing their potential implications on the stability of a therapeutic protein. Moreover, we discuss the limitations of current experimental approaches mimicking physiologic conditions, depending on the desired route of administration, such as intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), intravitreal (IVT), or intrathecal (IT) administration(s). New models more closely mimicking the relevant physiologic environment and updated analytical methods are required to understand the in vivo fate of therapeutic proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31900680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.