Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900671›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

Imaging indications and findings in evaluation of lung transplant graft dysfunction and rejection.

Mnahi Bin Saeedan, Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, C Randall Lane, Rahul D Renapurkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mnahi Bin SaeedanSections of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, L-10, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. binsaem@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-7914
Sanjay MukhopadhyayDepartment of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
C Randall LaneDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Rahul D RenapurkarSections of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, L-10, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation is a treatment option in end-stage lung disease. Complications can develop along a continuum in the immediate or longer post-transplant period, including surgical and technical complications, primary graft dysfunction, rejection, infections, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and recurrence of the primary disease. These complications have overlapping clinical and imaging features and often co-exist. Time of onset after transplant is helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis. In the early post transplantation period, imaging findings are non-specific and need to be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture and other investigations. In contrast, imaging plays a key role in diagnosing and monitoring patients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The goal of this article is to review primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, and chronic rejection with emphasis on the role of imaging, pathology findings, and differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Acute rejectionChronic lung allograft dysfunctionImaging findingsLung transplantation complicationsPrimary graft dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID31900671
PMCPMC6942098
OpenAlexW3012402227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.