Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900608›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

The perception of Israeli oncology staff members regarding advance care planning.

Gil Bar-Sela, Shlomit Bagon, Inbal Mitnik, Svetlana Baziliansky, Avigail Bar-Sella, Olga Vornicova, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions and experiences of onco-haematology professionals in relation to advance care planning: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gil Bar-SelaDivision of Oncology & Hematology, Emek Medical Center, 21 Yitzhak Rabin Blvd., 1834111, Afula, Israel. gil_ba@clalit.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6579-1841
Shlomit BagonDivision of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Inbal MitnikDivision of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Svetlana BazilianskyDivision of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Avigail Bar-SellaDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Olga VornicovaDivision of Oncology & Hematology, Emek Medical Center, 21 Yitzhak Rabin Blvd., 1834111, Afula, Israel.
Tzahala Tzuk-ShinaDivision of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Rambam Health Care Campus · ILEmek Medical Center · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILUniversity of Haifa · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) defines end-of-life care in accordance with the patients' preferences. It is highly important during mental and/or physical deterioration, which prevents patients from expressing their wishes. Despite various attempts worldwide to promote the issue, it is not well established, suggesting various challenges in the implementation of the process in the medical system. The current study aimed to evaluate the perception of Israeli oncology staff members regarding the process.

methodsPhysicians and nurses from a division of oncology participated in the study. They completed the study's questionnaires, which included quantitative items regarding staff and patients' motives and barriers, as well as qualitative questions to better evaluate their understanding regarding the process.

resultsAccording to staff members, the optimal time to complete the forms is during the final stages of the disease. Making the right medical decisions and avoiding unnecessary medical procedures were rated as the main motives for patients in the process. The communication factor was perceived as the main barrier for patients, as well as the main motive and barrier for staff. The central role of communication was demonstrated in the qualitative section as well. Various differences were demonstrated between staff members who talked with patients about ACP and those who did not.

conclusionThe study demonstrated the central role of communication in the process of ACP from the staff's perception. This highlights the need to further promote training programs for staff members to establish better interactions and communication skills when dealing with end-of-life issues.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAttitude of Health PersonnelAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansIsraelMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNursesPatient PreferencePhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareAdvance care planningAdvance directivesCancer patientsCommunicationDurable power of attorneyEnd-of-life

Identifiers

PMID31900608
OpenAlexW2997404652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.