Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900602›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2020

The Evolving Druggability and Developability Space: Chemically Modified New Modalities and Emerging Small Molecules.

Wenzhan Yang, Prajakta Gadgil, Venkata R Krishnamurthy, Margaret Landis, Pankajini Mallick, Dipal Patel, Phenil J Patel, Darren L Reid, Manuel Sanchez-Felix

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drug Design: Where We Are and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Therapeutic Advances in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Wenzhan YangEarly Product Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts, 02451, USA. wenzhan.yang@astrazeneca.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-5007
Prajakta GadgilAnalytical Development-Pharmaceutics Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Venkata R KrishnamurthyAdvance Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts, 02451, USA.
Margaret LandisMolecular Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Pankajini MallickPharmacology, Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics Division, ScitoVation, Durham, North Carolina, 27713, USA.
Dipal PatelPharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, 08543, USA.
Phenil J PatelSmall Molecule Design and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Darren L ReidSynthetics Enabling Technologies, Pre-Pivotal Drug Product, Drug Product Technologies, Amgen, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142, USA.
Manuel Sanchez-FelixChemical & Pharmaceutical Profiling (CPP), Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USAstraZeneca (Singapore) · SGAstraZeneca (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USEli Lilly (United States) · USNovartis (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · USTakeda (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The druggability and developability space is rapidly evolving in the post-genomic era. In the past, Lipinski's rule-of-five (Ro5) emerged and served as a guide for drug-like molecule design for oral delivery in the traditional druggable target space. In contrast, in this new era, a transition is occurring in drug discovery towards novel approaches to bind and modulate challenging biological targets that have led to transformative treatments for patients. Consequently, drugging novel targets using a variety of emerging molecular modalities, namely beyond the Ro5 (bRo5) small molecules (such as protein-protein interaction modulators, protein-targeted chimeras, or PROTACs), peptide/peptidomimetics, and nucleic acid-based modalities, have become a key focus in drug discovery. Herein, the emerging druggability and developability space is discussed side by side to build a general understanding of the potential development challenges of these novel modalities. An overview is provided on the evolving novel targets and molecular modalities, followed by a detailed analysis of the druggability aspects as well as the strategies used to progress drug candidate, and the trending chemistry and formulation strategies used to assess developability.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMolecular StructurePharmaceutical PreparationsProtein Interaction MapsSignal TransductionStructure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical Preparationsbeyond rule of fivedevelopabilitydruggabilityoligonucleotidespeptides

Identifiers

PMID31900602
OpenAlexW2998375419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.