SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2020
Twenty years of quantitative instrumental measures of swallowing in children: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research.Dysphagia · 2022Pooled it
- Dysphagia Management in Children: Implementation and Perspectives of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A preliminary deep learning study on automatic segmentation of contrast-enhanced bolus in videofluorography of swallowing.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Pediatric dysphagia overview: best practice recommendation study by multidisciplinary experts.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2022Review
- A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Predicting penetration-aspiration through quantitative swallow measures of children: a videofluoroscopic study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification and intervention has shown better health outcomes for children with dysphagia. Instrumental swallowing assessments are vital and have been a focus of dysphagia research in the last two decades. This systematic review explores published quantitative instrumental measures of swallowing in children. Five subject-related databases were searched to identify original scientific articles published in English, using instrumental quantitative measures of swallowing to study swallowing/feeding mechanism in children since 1998. Two thousand two hundred and two articles were found from the initial database search and 36 were included in the final qualitative synthesis following PRISMA guidelines. Selected studies showed great diversity in target population, phase/s of swallowing studied, instrumentation used (n = 10) and quantitative measures reported (n = 144). Videofluoroscopy and manometry have been studied most repeatedly. With less frequency, a variety of other instruments has been used to describe suck-swallow patterns and swallowing-related respiration. High-resolution manometry shows the greatest increase in publications with validated, reliable quantitative measures of pharyngeal and oesophageal pressures and timing. More recently, quantification of videofluoroscopy analysis has been a focus.Conclusion: A diverse range of quantitative measures of swallowing is available for children in the literature. However, further reliability and validity testing is needed. Opportunities for clinical application of these quantitative manometric and videofluoroscopic measures are restricted by limited normative comparisons and vast variability in published measures.What is known?• Instrumental swallowing assessments are reliable and accurate in diagnosing swallowing difficulties in children.• However, subjective interpretation of observational findings often questions the optimal use of instrumentation.What is new?• High-resolution manometry has shown promising progress with the development of quantitative objective swallow measures for children. While attempts to quantify video-fluoroscopic measures have been increased in the recent past.• A vast variety of instruments has been used to obtain quantitative and/or objective swallow measures of children, yet clinical application is still in progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31900589What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.