Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900568›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2020

The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

David Cagney, Lydia Simmons, Donal Peter O'Leary, Mark Corrigan, Louise Kelly, M J O'Sullivan, Aaron Liew, Henry Paul Redmond

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06265558 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Postoperative Complications by Negative Pressure Therapy After Complex Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2025 to 2027Enrolled254ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNegative pressure therapy (NPT), Dressing
NCT07607366 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Is Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Associated With a Decreased Risk of Postoperative Seroma in Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Undergone Mastectomy?

TypeinterventionalSponsorDalarna County Council, SwedenRan2025 to 2027Enrolled76ConditionsBreast Cancer - FemaleArmsPICO negative pressure wound therapy by Smith and Nephew
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David CagneyDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. cagney.davej@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-3175
Lydia SimmonsDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Donal Peter O'LearyDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Mark CorriganDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Louise KellyDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
M J O'SullivanDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Aaron LiewNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Henry Paul RedmondDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Cork University Hospital · IEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a promising advance in the management of closed surgical incisions. NPWT application induces several effects locally within the wound including reduced lateral tension and improving lymphatic drainage. As a result, NPWT may improve wound healing and reduce surgical site complications. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic application of NPWT in preventing surgical site complications for closed incisions in breast surgery.

methodsThis systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42018114625). Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies which compare the efficacy of NPWT versus non-NPWT dressings for closed incisions in breast surgery. Specific outcomes of interest were total wound complications, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma, wound dehiscence and necrosis.

resultsSeven studies (1500 breast incisions in 904 patients) met the inclusion criteria. NPWT was associated with a significantly lower rate of total wound complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-069; P = 0.002], SSI (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24-0.86; P = 0.015), seroma (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.59; P = 0.001), wound dehiscence (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32-0.72; P < 0.001) and wound necrosis (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.78; P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in haematoma rate (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.19-3.2; P = 0.75). Statistically significant heterogeneity existed for total wound complications, but no other outcomes.

conclusionCompared with conventional non-NPWT dressings, prophylactic application of NPWT is associated with significantly fewer surgical site complications including SSI, seroma, wound dehiscence and wound necrosis for closed breast incisions.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapyBandagesBreastHematomaHumansSeromaSurgical WoundSurgical Wound DehiscenceSurgical Wound InfectionWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID31900568
OpenAlexW2998541860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.