Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900525›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.

Merideth A Addicott, Margaret C Wardle, James P Selig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effort-related decision making and cannabis use among college students.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merideth A AddicottPsychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. maddicott@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1814-7994
Margaret C WardlePsychology Department, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
James P SeligDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Acute and Chronic Nicotine Modulation of Reinforcement LearningK01DA033347 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ADDICOTT, MERIDETH A. · 2013 to 2017
$734k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA033347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleA reduced willingness to perform effort based on the magnitude and probability of potential rewards has been associated with diminished dopamine function and may be relevant to chronic drug use.

objectivesHere, we investigated the influence of smoking status on effort-based decisions. We hypothesized that smokers would make fewer high-effort selections than ex-smokers and never-smokers.

methodsCurrent smokers (n = 25), ex-smokers (≥ 1 year quit, n = 23), and never-smokers (n = 19) completed the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task in which participants select between low-effort and high-effort options to receive monetary rewards at varying levels of reward magnitude, probability and expected value.

resultsOverall, participants selected more high-effort options as potential reward magnitude and expected value increased. Smokers did not make fewer high-effort selections overall, but smokers were less sensitive to the changes in magnitude, probability, and expected value compared to never-smokers. Smokers were also less sensitive to the changes in probability and expected value, but not magnitude, compared to ex-smokers. Among smokers and ex-smokers, less nicotine dependence was associated with an increased likelihood of high-effort selections.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the relevance of smoking status to effort-based decisions and suggest that smokers have diminished sensitivity to nondrug reward value. Among ex-smokers, greater pre-existing sensitivity to reward value may have been conducive to smoking cessation, or sensitivity was improved by smoking cessation. Future prospective studies can investigate whether effort-related decision making is predictive of smoking initiation or cessation success. IMPLICATIONS: Willingness to perform effort to achieve a goal and sensitivity to changes in reward value are important aspects of motivation. These results showed that smokers have decreased sensitivity to changes in effort-related reward probability and expected value compared to ex-smokers and never-smokers. Potentially, improved sensitivity to rewards among ex-smokers may be a cause or consequence of smoking cessation. These findings may help explain why some smokers are able to achieve long-term abstinence.

Indexed as

RewardAdultCigarette SmokingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationProspective StudiesPsychomotor PerformanceTobacco Use DisorderYoung AdultDecision makingEffortRewardSmoking cessationTobacco

Identifiers

PMID31900525
PMCPMC7125005
OpenAlexW2997747936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.