Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900468›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Intensified visual clutter induces increased sympathetic signalling, poorer postural control, and faster torsional eye movements during visual rotation.

Tobias Wibble, Ulrika Södergård, Frank Träisk, Tony Pansell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The effects of meclizine on motion sickness revisited.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias WibbleDivision of Ophthalmology and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-6274
Ulrika SödergårdDivision of Ophthalmology and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frank TräiskDivision of Ophthalmology and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tony PansellDivision of Ophthalmology and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-8263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many dizzy patients express a hypersensitivity to visual motion and clutter. This study aims to investigate how exposure to rotating visual clutter affects ocular torsion, vertical skewing, body-sway, the autonomic pupillary response, and the subjective feeling of discomfort to the stimulation. Sixteen healthy subjects were exposed to 20 seconds rotational visual stimulation (72 deg/s; 50 deg visual field). Visual stimuli were comprised of black lines on a white background, presented at low and high intensity levels of visual clutter, holding 19 lines and 38 lines respectively. Ocular torsion and vertical skewing were recorded using the Chronos Eye Tracker, which also measured pupil size as a reflection of the autonomic response. Postural control was evaluated by measuring body-sway area on the Wii Balance Board. Values were compared to data retrieved 20 seconds before and after the optokinetic stimulation, as subjects viewed the stationary visual scene. The high intensity stimulus resulted in significantly higher torsional velocities. Subjects who were exposed to low intensity first exhibited higher velocities for both intensities. Both pupil size and body sway increased for the higher intensity to both the moving and stationary visual scene, and were positively correlated to torsional velocity. In conclusion, exposure to visual clutter was reflected in the eye movement response, changes in postural control, and the autonomic response. This response may hold clinical utility when assessing patients suffering from visual motion hypersensitivity, while also providing some context as to why some healthy people feel discomfort in visually cluttered surroundings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEye MovementsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPostural BalancePostureRotationVision, OcularVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31900468
PMCPMC6941927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.