Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900419›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A shared genetic basis of mimicry across swallowtail butterflies points to ancestral co-option of doublesex.

Daniela H Palmer, Marcus R Kronforst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Can convergence in mixed-species flocks lead to evolutionary divergence? Evidence for and methods to test this hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Secondary contact rather than coexistence-Erebia butterflies in the Alps.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Frontiers in insect science · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniela H PalmerCommittee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. d.h.palmer@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-9632
Marcus R KronforstCommittee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-891X

Funding

Characterizing the Molecular Basis of Supergene Mimicry in ButterfliesR35GM131828 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Marcus Kronforst · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
Characterizing the Molecular Basis of Supergene Mimicry in ButterfliesR01GM108626 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KRONFORST, MARCUS · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108626NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncovering whether convergent adaptations share a genetic basis is consequential for understanding the evolution of phenotypic diversity. This information can help us understand the extent to which shared ancestry or independent evolution shape adaptive phenotypes. In this study, we first ask whether the same genes underlie polymorphic mimicry in Papilio swallowtail butterflies. By comparing signatures of genetic variation between polymorphic and monomorphic species, we then investigate how ancestral variation, hybridization, and independent evolution contributed to wing pattern diversity in this group. We report that a single gene, doublesex (dsx), controls mimicry across multiple taxa, but with species-specific patterns of genetic differentiation and linkage disequilibrium. In contrast to widespread examples of phenotypic evolution driven by introgression, our analyses reveal distinct mimicry alleles. We conclude that mimicry evolution in this group was likely facilitated by ancestral polymorphism resulting from early co-option of dsx as a mimicry locus, and that evolutionary turnover of dsx alleles may underlie the wing pattern diversity of extant polymorphic and monomorphic lineages.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological MimicryButterfliesDNA-Binding ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFemaleInsect ProteinsMalePhenotypePhylogenySpecies SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31900419
PMCPMC6941989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.