Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900236›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2020

iRECIST: how to do it.

Thorsten Persigehl, Simon Lennartz, Lawrence H Schwartz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07174453 (A Late Phase Randomized Open-Label Multi Cohort Trial to Evaluate irAEs With Different Standard of Care Dosing Strategies of Standard of Care Immunotherapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07174453 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Late Phase Randomized Open-Label Multi Cohort Trial to Evaluate irAEs With Different Standard of Care Dosing Strategies of Standard of Care Immunotherapies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled192ConditionsSolid Tumor MalignanciesArmsNivolumab, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nivolumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ATTRACTION-2): 3-year update and outcome of treatment beyond progression with nivolumab.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. IK-175, an Oral Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Inhibitor, Alone and with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and Urothelial Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thorsten PersigehlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. thorsten.persigehl@uk-koeln.de.
Simon LennartzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundiRECIST for the objective monitoring of immunotherapies was published by the official RECIST working group in 2017. MAIN BODY: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors represent one of the most important therapy advancements in modern oncology. They are currently used for treatment of multiple malignant diseases especially at advanced, metastatic stages which were poorly therapeutically accessible in the past. Promising results of recent studies suggest that their application will further grow in the near future, particularly when used in combination with chemotherapy. A challenging aspect of these immunotherapies is that they may show atypical therapy response patterns such as pseudoprogression and demonstrate a different imaging spectrum of adverse reactions, both of which are crucial for radiologists to understand. In 2017 the RECIST working group published a modified set of response criteria, iRECIST, for immunotherapy, based on RECIST 1.1 which was developed for cytotoxic therapies and adapted for targeted agents.

conclusionThis article provides guidance for response assessment of oncologic patients under immunotherapy based on iRECIST criteria.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsImmunotherapyiRECISTPseudoprogressionResponse evaluationTherapy monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31900236
PMCPMC6942293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.