ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020
Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06753643 (Implementing the National Frailty Policy in Singapore's Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing the National Frailty Policy in Singapore's Primary Care: A Pilot Feasibility Study of The Intrinsic Capacity ProMotion in PrimAry Care for The Frail Program (IMPACTFrail)
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the scalability of healthy eating interventions within the early childhood education and care setting: secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.Public health nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Evidence on Scaling in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Pooled it
- Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of adaptations and effectiveness of scaled-up nutrition interventions.Nutrition reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Domains and Methods Used to Assess Home Telemonitoring Scalability: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- How effective are physical activity interventions when they are scaled-up: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Pooled it
- A theoretically designed scale-up intervention increases adoption of an effective school nutrition program 'SWAP IT': outcomes of a randomised trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Readiness for scale up following effectiveness-implementation trial: results of scalability assessment of the Community Partnership Program for diabetes self-management for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Scaling up the Med-South Lifestyle Program in public health settings to reduce chronic disease risk: a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of Promoting Physical Activity in Regional and Remote Cancer Survivors (PPARCS).Journal of sport and health science · 2024Trial
- Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- Feasibility of decentralised, task-shifted hepatitis C testing and treatment services in urban Myanmar: implications for scale-up.BMJ open · 2022Trial
- Exploring a parent-focused physical literacy intervention for early childhood: a pragmatic controlled trial of the PLAYshop.BMC public health · 2022Trial
- Article
- Evaluation of a culturally tailored lifestyle intervention among Pasifika: a feasibility study.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Do we consider scalability from the outset? A methodological review of pilot randomised controlled health trials.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Estimation of leaf nitrogen content in fruit trees within Arid Oasis Orchards using UAV-based spectral-texture fusion.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Patient and Carer Perspectives on the Acceptability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Analysis of real-world scale-up processes for school-based mental health interventions.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPromising health interventions tested in pilot studies will only achieve population-wide impact if they are implemented at scale across communities and health systems. Scaling up effective health interventions is vital as not doing so denies the community the most effective services and programmes. However, there remains a paucity of practical tools to assess the suitability of health interventions for scale-up. The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT) was developed to support policy-makers and practitioners to make systematic assessments of the suitability of health interventions for scale-up.
methodsThe ISAT was developed over three stages; the first stage involved a literature review to identify similar tools and frameworks that could be used to guide scalability assessments, and expert input to develop draft ISAT content. In the second stage, the draft ISAT tool was tested with end users. The third stage involved revising and re-testing the ISAT with end users to further refine the language and structure of the final ISAT.
resultsA variety of information and sources of evidence should be used to complete the ISAT. The ISAT consists of three parts. Part A: 'setting the scene' requires consideration of the context in which the intervention is being considered for scale-up and consists of five domains, as follows: (1) the problem; (2) the intervention; (3) strategic/political context; (4) evidence of effectiveness; and (5) intervention costs and benefits. Part B asks users to assess the potential implementation and scale-up requirements within five domains, namely (1) fidelity and adaptation; (2) reach and acceptability; (3) delivery setting and workforce; (4) implementation infrastructure; and (5) sustainability. Part C generates a graphical representation of the strengths and weaknesses of the readiness of the proposed intervention for scale-up. Users are also prompted for a recommendation as to whether the intervention (1) is recommended for scale-up, (2) is promising but needs further information before scaling up, or (3) does not yet merit scale-up.
conclusionThe ISAT fills an important gap in applied scalability assessment and can become a critical decision support tool for policy-makers and practitioners when selecting health interventions for scale-up. Although the ISAT is designed to be a health policy and practitioner tool, it can also be used by researchers in the design of research to fill important evidence gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.