Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900210›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2020

Diagnostic studies of abortion in Danish cattle 2015-2017.

Godelind Alma Wolf-Jäckel, Mette Sif Hansen, Gitte Larsen, Elisabeth Holm, Jørgen Steen Agerholm, Tim Kåre Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. First report ofBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Laboratory investigation of causes of bovine abortion and stillbirth in the Republic of Korea, 2014-2020.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  9. Infectious sporadic bovine abortions: retrospective analysis.Tropical animal health and production · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathological and etiological characterization of cases of bovine abortion due to sporadic bacterial and mycotic infections.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  13. Viruses · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pathological findings in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) in South Africa.Journal of the South African Veterinary Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Godelind Alma Wolf-JäckelNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. gowol@vet.dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-3443
Mette Sif HansenNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Gitte LarsenNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Elisabeth HolmNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Jørgen Steen AgerholmSection for Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegaard Alle 5A, 2630, Taastrup, Denmark.
Tim Kåre JensenNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbortion is a major source of economic losses in cattle breeding. Abortion occurs due to a wide range of causes, but infections are the most frequently diagnosed. However, establishing an aetiological diagnosis remains challenging due to the large variety of bacteria, protozoa, viruses, and fungi that have been associated with abortion in cattle. Economic restraints limit the range of diagnostic methods available for routine diagnostics, and decomposition of the conceptus or lack of proper fetal and/or maternal samples further restrict the diagnostic success. In this study, we report recent diagnostic findings from bovine abortions in Denmark, a country that has a large dairy sector and is free from most infectious agents causing epizootic abortion in cattle. The aims of the study were: (i) to identify infectious causes of bovine abortion in Denmark, (ii) to categorise the diagnostic findings based on the level of diagnostic certainty, and (iii) to assess the diagnostic rate. Due to economic restraints, only a limited panel of routine diagnostic methods were available. Placentas and/or fetuses from mid- to late-term abortions and stillbirths (n = 162) were submitted to the Danish National Veterinary Institute between January 2015 and June 2017. The aborted materials were examined macroscopically, histologically, and by bacterial culture. Maternal blood samples were tested for bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) antibodies.

resultsThe likely aetiology of the abortion was diagnosed in 52 cases, resulting in a diagnostic rate of 33%. The most common cause was protozoal infection (19%) followed by infection with Trueperella pyogenes (3%), Staphylococcus aureus (2%), and non-haemolytic Escherichia coli (2%). Lesions in fetuses with a protozoal infection were consistent with neosporosis. In many cases (38%), inflammatory changes were found in the placenta and/or fetal organs but no specific aetiology was identified. Neither infection with Brucella spp. nor maternal BVDV antibodies were detected. The majority of submitting herds (92%) were each represented by fewer than three abortion cases over the study period.

conclusionsProtozoal infection, most likely neosporosis, was the most commonly diagnosed cause of abortion and the only one associated with potential epizootic abortion events. Despite using a reduced number of diagnostic methods in comparison to other abortion studies, the diagnostic rate of this study was within the range reported in an earlier Danish study, as well as in recent international studies. The low number of submitted cases per herd and the sparse anamnestic information provided at submission hampered conclusions on the potential epizootic character of the abortion events in question.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryPlacentaAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBacterial InfectionsCattleCattle DiseasesDenmarkFemaleFetusPregnancyProtozoan Infections, AnimalAntibodies, ViralDenmarkEscherichia coliNeospora caninumStaphylococcus aureusTrueperella pyogenesZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID31900210
PMCPMC6942357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.