ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020
Correction to: The association between premorbid beta blocker exposure and mortality in sepsis-a systematic review.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of premorbid beta-blockers on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a retrospective study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic pulmonary edema - is it lone cardiogenic? "Missing link" between hemodynamic and other existing mechanisms.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2024Review
- Premorbid use of selective beta-blockers improves sepsis incidence and course: Human cohort and animal model studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Pharmacotherapeutic agents for the management of COVID-19 patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2021Review
- Lower In-Hospital Mortality With Beta-Blocker Use at Admission in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the publication of this article [1], there was an error in the cited reference 23 [2] within the Family Name. This has now been updated in the original article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.