ArticleGlobalization and health2020
Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling.
Article in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Food Allergens and Emerging Biosensing Technologies.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Designing front-of-pack labels for packaged food in low-literacy contexts: Consumer perspectives from India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Sodium content of packaged foods and beverages in Nigeria: a cross-sectional comparative study with WHO global sodium benchmarks, Kenya, and South Africa.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
- How food regulations help or hinder the implementation of policies to promote healthy population diets: a review of food regulations in the Western Pacific Region.Public health nutrition · 2025Review
- Policy implications of Codex Alimentarius guidelines on nutrition labelling.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
- An ecological reorientation of the Codex Alimentarius Commission could help transform food systems.Nature food · 2024Review
- Complementarity between the updated version of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score and the food-processing NOVA classification.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- Understanding the Politics of Food Regulation and Public Health: An Analysis of Codex Standard-Setting Processes on Food Labelling.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Hollow Threats: Transnational Food and Beverage Companies' Use of International Agreements to Fight Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling in Mexico and Beyond.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Baby food industry interference with infant feeding international regulation-A case study on the standard for follow-up formula.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Expanding our understanding of industry opposition to help implement sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- What You Don't Know About the Codex Can Hurt You: How Trade Policy Trumps Global Health Governance in Infant and Young Child Nutrition.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
- Analysis of the policy process for the implementation of nutritional warning labels in Uruguay.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
- International Trade and Investment Agreements as Barriers to Food Environment Regulation for Public Health Nutrition: A Realist Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Review
- Who influences nutrition policy space using international trade and investment agreements? A global stakeholder analysis.Globalization and health · 2021Article
- Food environment solutions for childhood obesity in Latin America and among Latinos living in the United States.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021Review
- Article
- Nutrient Profiling Systems, Front of Pack Labeling, and Consumer Behavior.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition labelling at the global level will almost certainly influence national policy making. This shift in Codex's activities towards standards to address NCDs presents new risks for achievement of public health goals, as a result of the high level of industry involvement in this forum; there is a potential commercial conflict of interest held by manufacturers of products whose consumption could be discouraged by such guidance. In this Commentary, we examine the implications of Codex processes for developing robust global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling and identify opportunities to increase consideration of public health objectives. To date, there has been significantly higher representation of food industry compared to public health actors in Codex discussions on FoP nutrition labelling. Without a strong public health voice in Codex, the industry voice could dominate discussions on FoP nutrition labelling, such that subsequent global guidance prioritises future trade and profits over potential risks to public health. There is currently a critical window of opportunity for public health interests to be prioritised in this multisectoral international forum. The key public health priority for global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling is to ensure protection of policy space for national governments to implement strong and effective regulation, and allow scope for innovation. Public health actors can engage directly with Codex processes, at both the national and global level, and also need to raise awareness among domestic policy makers - including with Ministries of Agriculture and Industry, which often represent countries at Codex - regarding the importance and effectiveness of FoP labelling in NCD prevention. Increased engagement with Codex processes represents a tangible new opportunity to strengthen global governance for public health, and move towards improved coherence between trade policy and health protection goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.