Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900150›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state following hip arthroscopy using the 12 item international hip outcome tool.

Patrick G Robinson, Julian F Maempel, Conor S Rankin, Paul Gaston, David F Hamilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Associating Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With Patient Resilience.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parameters affecting baseline hip function in patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: data analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick G RobinsonTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland. Patrick.robinson321@gmail.com.
Julian F MaempelTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland.
Conor S RankinTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland.
Paul GastonTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland.
David F HamiltonTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) is a shorter version of the iHOT-33 which measures health related quality of life following treatment of hip disorders in young, active patients. The purpose of this study was identify a PASS threshold for a UK population undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular hip pathology.

methodsData was identified retrospectively from a prospective database of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy under the care of a single surgeon within the date range January 2013 to March 2017. All patients with a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingment (FAI) undergoing arthroscopic treatment were included. iHOT-12, EuroQol 5D-5 L (EQ-5D-5 L) and a satisfaction questionnaire were available pre and post-operatively. PASS was calculated using an anchor-based approach and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.

results171 patients underwent hip arthroscopy in the study period. Linked longitudinal follow-up data was available for 122 patients (71.3%) at a median of 24.3 months (740 days, interquartile range 576-1047). The PASS threshold for the iHOT-12 was 59.5 (sensitivity 81.1%, specificity 83.9%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97). 64% of patients achieved this score. The median postoperative iHOT-12 score was 72.5 (IQR 44) and the mean change in score was 35 (SD 25, p < 0.001). The EQ-5D Index improved by 0.18 (SD 0.25, p < 0.001) and there was a mean change of 7.67 (SD 24.82) on the EQ-5D VAS (p = 0.001).

conclusionsWe report a PASS threshold of the iHOT-12 following hip arthroscopy for FAI as a measurable benchmark for clinicians using this outcome measure.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementHip JointHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesFemoracetabularHipiHOT-12ImpingementPyschometric

Identifiers

PMID31900150
PMCPMC6942269
OpenAlexW3000732560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.