Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31900133›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Treatment patterns and sequences of pharmacotherapy for patients diagnosed with depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019.

David M Kern, M Soledad Cepeda, Frank Defalco, Mila Etropolski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Care pathways for people with major depressive disorder: a European Brain Council Value of Treatment study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M KernJanssen Research & Development, Epidemiology, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA. dkern2@its.jnj.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-3925
M Soledad CepedaJanssen Research & Development, Epidemiology, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA.
Frank DefalcoJanssen Research & Development, Epidemiology, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA.
Mila EtropolskiJanssen Research & Development, Neuroscience TA, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA.
Janssen (United States) · US

Funding

Janssen Research and Development n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression.

methodsPatients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and 3 years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up.

resultsWe identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29 to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line.

conclusionsMany patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypnotics and SedativesInsurance Claim ReportingMaleMiddle AgedSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicHypnotics and SedativesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressantsDepressionReal-world evidenceTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID31900133
PMCPMC6942399
OpenAlexW3005056829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.