ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020
Glycated albumin in pregnancy: reference intervals establishment and its predictive value in adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of continuous glucose monitoring for diagnosis of gestational diabetes: exploring the potential.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- Usefulness of glycated albumin levels in predicting the maternal or neonatal complications of gestational diabetes mellitus during late pregnancy in South Korea: a retrospective study.Korean journal of family medicine · 2025Article
- Performance of flash continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic marker correlations in Chinese pregnant women with non-type 1 diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Role of random blood glucose and HbA1c levels in optimizing glucose tolerance screening in early pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Exploring Saliva as a Sample for Non-Invasive Glycemic Monitoring in Diabetes: A Scoping Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Glycated albumin levels in the third trimester of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Glycated albumin in pregnancy correlates negatively with body mass index and contributes to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.Practical laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Predictive Utility of Biochemical Markers for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Plasma Glycated Albumin in Early Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective and Longitudinal Study.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Postnatal levels of glycated albumin and glycated hemoglobin A1c in mothers of large-for-gestational-age newborns.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Glycated Albumin and Glycemia in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Pilot Study.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
- A Longitudinal Study of Plasma Glycated Albumin across Pregnancy and Associations with Maternal Characteristics and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers.Clinical chemistry · 2023Article
- Performance of glycated albumin as a biomarker of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004.Clinical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Progress and indication for use of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes in pregnancy: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany efforts have been focused on the alternative glycemic marker glycated albumin (GlyA) and its application in pregnancy during which profound physiological changes take place. Our objective was to determine the reference intervals (RIs) of GlyA in healthy Chinese pregnant women and to assess the predictive value of serum GlyA in adverse pregnancy outcomes.
methodsTotally 421 healthy subjects including 137 in the first trimester, 152 in the second trimester, and 132 in the third trimester were enrolled from March to July 2019, for the purpose of establishing the trimester-specific RIs of GlyA. In addition, 67 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM were enrolled at 24-28 weeks of gestation. The diagnostic value of GlyA for GDM patients was evaluated and compared with that of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at 24-28 weeks of gestation. The association between GlyA in the late pregnancy and the adverse pregnancy outcomes was analyzed with the data collected from January to June 2018 at our hospital.
resultsThe estimated RIs of GlyA in present study were 11.26-15.10%, 10.04-13.50%, and 9.76-13.09% in the first, second, and third trimesters respectively. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.503 for GlyA and 0.705 for FPG. More importantly, the GlyA level in the third trimester was not more elevated in the patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes including large for gestational age (LGA), preterm delivery, hypertension and preeclampsia (PE). The exception was made with the GDM patients who suffered from postpartum hemorrhage and had significantly higher GlyA levels than the control group.
conclusionsOur results showed that the GlyA was continuously decreased as the gestational age went up. The GlyA testing has limited value in diagnosing GDM and predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.