Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31899899›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2020

Diversity in biology: definitions, quantification and models.

Song Xu, Lucas Böttcher, Tom Chou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chaotic turnover of rare and abundant species in a strongly interacting model community.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diversity strengthens competing teams.Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  11. Quantifying information of intracellular signaling: progress with machine learning.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2022
    Review
  12. A statistical model of COVID-19 testing in populations: effects of sampling bias andtesting errors.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Song XuCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Lucas Böttcher
Tom Chou

Funding

Tracking clonal dynamics during hematopoiesis: mechanistic insight via modeling and data analysisR01HL146552 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHOU, TOM · 2019 to 2022
$907k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity indices are useful single-number metrics for characterizing a complex distribution of a set of attributes across a population of interest. The utility of these different metrics or sets of metrics depends on the context and application, and whether a predictive mechanistic model exists. In this topical review, we first summarize the relevant mathematical principles underlying heterogeneity in a large population, before outlining the various definitions of 'diversity' and providing examples of scientific topics in which its quantification plays an important role. We then review how diversity has been a ubiquitous concept across multiple fields, including ecology, immunology, cellular barcoding experiments, and socioeconomic studies. Since many of these applications involve sampling of populations, we also review how diversity in small samples is related to the diversity in the entire population. Features that arise in each of these applications are highlighted.

Indexed as

BiodiversityModels, BiologicalAnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalEntropyHumans

Identifiers

PMID31899899
PMCPMC8788892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.