Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31899863›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2020

Differential Network Analysis Reveals Metabolic Determinants Associated with Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients and Suggests Potential Mechanisms Underlying Different Clinical Scores Used To Predict Death.

Alessia Vignoli, Leonardo Tenori, Betti Giusti, Serafina Valente, Nazario Carrabba, Daniela Balzi, Alessandro Barchielli, Niccolò Marchionni, Gian Franco Gensini, Rossella Marcucci and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Precision Oncology via NMR-Based Metabolomics: A Review on Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Applications of Metabolomics in Forensic Toxicology and Forensic Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessia VignoliMagnetic Resonance Center (CERM) , University of Florence , Sesto Fiorentino 50019 , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-6596
Leonardo TenoriMagnetic Resonance Center (CERM) , University of Florence , Sesto Fiorentino 50019 , Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-059X
Betti GiustiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , University of Florence , Florence 50134 Italy.
Serafina ValenteDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , University of Florence , Florence 50134 Italy.
Nazario CarrabbaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery , Careggi Hospital , Florence 50134 , Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5190-5227
Daniela BalziUnit of Epidemiology , ASL 10, Florence 50122 , Italy.
Alessandro BarchielliUnit of Epidemiology , ASL 10, Florence 50122 , Italy.
Niccolò MarchionniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , University of Florence , Florence 50134 Italy.
Gian Franco GensiniCentro Studi Medicina Avanzata (CESMAV) , Florence 50121 Italy.
Rossella MarcucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , University of Florence , Florence 50134 Italy.
Anna Maria GoriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , University of Florence , Florence 50134 Italy.
Claudio LuchinatMagnetic Resonance Center (CERM) , University of Florence , Sesto Fiorentino 50019 , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-8921
Edoardo SaccentiLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology , Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708 WE , the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8284-4829
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITInteruniversity Consortium for Magnetic Resonance · ITTecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITUniversity of Florence · ITWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present here the differential analysis of metabolite-metabolite association networks constructed from an array of 24 serum metabolites identified and quantified via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a cohort of 825 patients of which 123 died within 2 years from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated differences in metabolite connectivity of patients who survived, at 2 years, the AMI event, and we characterized metabolite-metabolite association networks specific to high and low risks of death according to four different risk parameters, namely, acute coronary syndrome classification, Killip, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score, and metabolomics NOESY RF risk score. We show significant differences in the connectivity patterns of several low-molecular-weight molecules, implying variations in the regulation of several metabolic pathways regarding branched-chain amino acids, alanine, creatinine, mannose, ketone bodies, and energetic metabolism. Our results demonstrate that the characterization of metabolite-metabolite association networks is a promising and powerful tool to investigate AMI patients according to their outcomes at a molecular level.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsRisk Factorsacute myocardial infarctionmetabolite−metabolite association networksmetabolomicsnetwork inferencenuclear magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID31899863
PMCPMC7011173
OpenAlexW2997440030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.