Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31899565›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

The cascade of care for opioid use disorder: a retrospective study in British Columbia, Canada.

Micah Piske, Haoxuan Zhou, Jeong E Min, Natt Hongdilokkul, Lindsay A Pearce, Fahmida Homayra, M Eugenia Socias, Gina McGowan, Bohdan Nosyk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bed-based care as a response to the overdose crisis: an approach to informing and evaluating proposed expansion.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Micah PiskeBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Haoxuan ZhouBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jeong E MinBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Natt HongdilokkulBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lindsay A PearceBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Fahmida HomayraBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
M Eugenia SociasFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-7049
Gina McGowanBritish Columbia Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Bohdan NosykBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-3718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe 'cascade of care' framework, measuring attrition at various stages of care engagement, has been proposed to guide the public health response to the opioid overdose public health emergency in British Columbia, Canada. We estimated the cascade of care for opioid use disorder and identified factors associated with care engagement for people with opioid use disorder (PWOUD) provincially.

designRetrospective study using a provincial-level linkage of four health administrative databases. SETTING AND

participantsAll PWOUD in BC from 1 January 1996 to 30 November 2017. MEASUREMENTS: The eight-stage cascade of care included diagnosed PWOUD, ever on opioid agonist treatment (OAT), recently on OAT, currently on OAT and retained on OAT: ≥ 1, ≥ 3, ≥ 12 and ≥ 24 months). Health-care use, homelessness and other demographics were obtained from physician billing records, hospitalizations, and drug dispensation records. Receipt of income assistance was indicated by enrollment in Pharmacare Plan C.

findingsA total of 55 470 diagnosed PWOUD were alive at end of follow-up. As of 2017, a majority of the population (n = 39 456; 71%) received OAT during follow-up; however, only 33% (n = 18 519) were currently engaged in treatment and 16% (n = 8960) had been retained for at least 1 year. Compared with those never on OAT, those currently engaged in OAT were more likely to be aged under 45 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.64, 1.89], male (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.64, 1.82), with concurrent substance use disorders (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 2.44, 2.70), hepatitis C virus (HCV) (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.33) and either homeless or receiving income-assistance (aOR = 4.35, 95% CI = 4.17, 4.55). Regular contact with the health-care system-either in out-patient or acute care settings-was common among PWOUD not engaged in OAT, regardless of time since diagnosis or treatment discontinuation.

conclusionsPeople with opioid use disorder in British Columbia, Canada show high levels of out-patient care prior to diagnosis. Younger age, male sex, urban residence, lower income level and homelessness appear to be independently associated with increased opioid agonist treatment engagement.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidBritish ColumbiaBuprenorphineFemaleHepatitis CHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAddictionbuprenorphine/naloxonecascade of carecohort studiesmethadoneopioid agonist treatmentopioid use disordersubstance use

Identifiers

PMID31899565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.