ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
PaSiT: a novel approach based on short-oligonucleotide frequencies for efficient bacterial identification and typing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Genomics and Adaptive Evolution ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Isolation and characterization of a novel methanogen Methanosarcina hadiensis sp. nov. from subsurface Boom Clay pore water.Environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Benchmarking short-, long- and hybrid-read assemblers for metagenome sequencing of complex microbial communities.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2024Article
- Utilizing genomic signatures to gain insights into the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through Machine and Deep Learning techniques.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- OpenGenomeBrowser: a versatile, dataset-independent and scalable web platform for genome data management and comparative genomics.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Introduction to the principles and methods underlying the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic data.MicrobiologyOpen · 2022Review
- Accurate prediction of metagenome-assembled genome completeness by MAGISTA, a random forest model built on alignment-free intra-bin statistics.Environmental microbiome · 2022Article
- Generating human papillomavirus (HPV) reference databases to maximize genomic mapping.Archives of virology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationOne of the most widespread methods used in taxonomy studies to distinguish between strains or taxa is the calculation of average nucleotide identity. It requires a computationally expensive alignment step and is therefore not suitable for large-scale comparisons. Short oligonucleotide-based methods do offer a faster alternative but at the expense of accuracy. Here, we aim to address this shortcoming by providing a software that implements a novel method based on short-oligonucleotide frequencies to compute inter-genomic distances.
resultsOur tetranucleotide and hexanucleotide implementations, which were optimized based on a taxonomically well-defined set of over 200 newly sequenced bacterial genomes, are as accurate as the short oligonucleotide-based method TETRA and average nucleotide identity, for identifying bacterial species and strains, respectively. Moreover, the lightweight nature of this method makes it applicable for large-scale analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method introduced here was implemented, together with other existing methods, in a dependency-free software written in C, GenDisCal, available as source code from https://github.com/LM-UGent/GenDisCal. The software supports multithreading and has been tested on Windows and Linux (CentOS). In addition, a Java-based graphical user interface that acts as a wrapper for the software is also available. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.