Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31899032›Full record

Observational studyOphthalmology2020

Measuring Glaucomatous Focal Perfusion Loss in the Peripapillary Retina Using OCT Angiography.

Aiyin Chen, Liang Liu, Jie Wang, Pengxiao Zang, Beth Edmunds, Lorinna Lombardi, Ellen Davis, John C Morrison, Yali Jia, David Huang

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Devices in Glaucoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Optical coherence tomography.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aiyin ChenCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Liang LiuCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jie WangCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Pengxiao ZangCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Beth EdmundsCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Lorinna LombardiCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ellen DavisCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
John C MorrisonCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Yali JiaCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
David HuangCasey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: davidhuang@alum.mit.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
STUDIES IN GLAUCOMATOUS OPTIC NERVE DAMAGER01EY010145 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISON, JOHN C · 1993 to 2023
$8.9M
Functional and Structural Optical Coherence Tomography for GlaucomaR01EY023285 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2013 to 2026
$8.8M
Mentored Vision Clinician-Scientist Program at OHSUK12EY027720 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY027720NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010145NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo measure low perfusion areas (LPAs) and focal perfusion loss (FPL) in the peripapillary retina using OCT angiography (OCTA) in glaucoma.

designProspective, observational study.

participantsA total of 47 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 36 normal participants were analyzed.

methodsOne eye of each subject was scanned using an AngioVue (Optovue, Fremont, CA) 4.5-mm OCTA scan centered on the disc. En face nerve fiber layer (NFL) plexus angiogram was generated. With the use of custom software, a capillary density map was obtained by computing the fraction of area occupied by flow pixels after low-pass filtering by local averaging 21×21 pixels. The low-perfusion map is defined by local capillary density below 0.5 percentile over a contiguous area above 98.5 percentile of the normal reference population. The LPA parameter is the cumulative area, and the FPL is the percent capillary density loss (relative to normal mean) integrated over the LPA.

main outcome measuresPeripapillary retinal LPA and FPL.

resultsAmong patients with POAG, 3 had preperimetric glaucoma and 44 had perimetric glaucoma, with visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) of -5.14±4.25 decibels (dB). The LPA was 3.40±2.29 mm

conclusionsThe low-perfusion map and LPA and FPL parameters are able to assess the location and severity of focal glaucoma damage with good agreement with VF.

Indexed as

AgedArterial PressureBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal Vessels

Identifiers

PMID31899032
PMCPMC7093216
OpenAlexW2984549303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.