ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Improved MR fingerprinting for relaxation measurement in the presence of semisolid magnetization transfer.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic and rapid deep synthesis of chemical exchange saturation transfer and semisolid magnetization transfer MRI signals.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize and minimize the magnetization transfer (MT) effect in MR fingerprinting (MRF) relaxation measurements with a 2-pool (2P) MT model of multiple tissue types. THEORY AND
methodsSemisolid MT effect in MRF was modeled using 2P Bloch-McConnell equations. The combinations of MT parameters of multiple tissues (white [WM] and gray matter [GM]) were used to build the MRF dictionary. Both 1-pool (1P) and 2P models were simulated to characterize the dependence on MT. Relaxations measured using MRF with spin-echo saturation-recovery (SR) or inversion-recovery preparations were compared with conventional SR-prepared T
resultsThe MRF signal was different from the 1P and 2P models. 1P MRF produced significantly (P < .05) underestimated T
conclusions2P MRF using a combination of MT parameters for multiple tissue types can measure consistent relaxations with conventional methods. With the 2P models, SR-prepared MRF would provide an option for robust relaxation measurement under heterogeneous MT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.