Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898760›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020

Field evaluation of a novel oral reservoir-targeted vaccine against Borrelia burgdorferi utilizing an inactivated whole-cell bacterial antigen expression vehicle.

Kirby C Stafford, Scott C Williams, Jolieke G van Oosterwijk, Megan A Linske, Steve Zatechka, Luciana M Richer, Goudarz Molaei, Chris Przybyszewski, Stephen K Wikel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Protective efficacy of mutant strains ofInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Minor Hosts Have a Major Impact on the Enzootic Transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirby C StaffordCenter for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Scott C WilliamsCenter for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. scott.williams@ct.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-7703
Jolieke G van OosterwijkU.S. Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA.
Megan A LinskeCenter for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Steve ZatechkaU.S. Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA.
Luciana M RicherU.S. Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA.
Goudarz MolaeiCenter for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Chris PrzybyszewskiU.S. Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA.
Stephen K WikelU.S. Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA.
US Biologic (United States) · USConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station · US

Funding

CDC HHS CK000182-03Hatch Act Funds 000US Biologic, Inc. 000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) are the principal vector for Borrelia burgdorferi, among other infectious agents, in the northeastern, mid-Atlantic, and upper midwestern USA. White-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) are the primary and most competent reservoir host of B. burgdorferi in the Northeast. Live reservoir-targeted vaccines (RTVs) to limit enzootic transmission of B. burgdorferi were previously developed and successfully evaluated in laboratory and controlled field trials. A novel, inactivated RTV was developed to minimize regulatory and market challenges facing previous RTVs based on live bacterial or viral vehicles. Thirty-two residential properties in Redding, Connecticut, participated in a field trial of an orally delivered, inactivated RTV efficacy study (2015-2016). During the two-year vaccination period, a significant decrease in the percentage of B. burgdorferi-infected I. scapularis larvae parasitizing P. leucopus was observed, as was a significant reduction in the percentage of infected P. leucopus on RTV-treated properties when compared to control properties. This novel inactivated RTV was effective in reducing numbers of B. burgdorferi-infected I. scapularis and B. burgdorferi-infected P. leucopus on properties where it was distributed.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesConnecticutIxodesLarvaLyme DiseasePeromyscusAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesBorrelia burgdorferiInactivated expression vehicleIxodes scapularisPeromyscus leucopusReservoir-targeted vaccine

Identifiers

PMID31898760
OpenAlexW2998484571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.