Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898550›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2020

Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment.

Erin S Rogers, Elizabeth A Vargas, Elizabeth Voigt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04200157 (Testing the Decoy Effect to Increase Tobacco Treatment Uptake), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04200157 completednot on this map

Testing the Decoy Effect to Increase Tobacco Treatment Uptake

TypeobservationalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2018 to 2019Enrolled600ConditionsTobacco SmokingArmsOnline survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin S RogersDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Erin.Rogers@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3207-7956
Elizabeth A VargasDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Elizabeth VoigtDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGuidelines recommend that smokers participate in four or more counseling sessions when trying to quit, but smokers rarely engage in multiple sessions. The "decoy effect" is a cognitive bias that can cause consumer preferences for a "target" product to change when presented with a similar but inferior product (a "decoy"). This study tested the use of a decoy to guide smokers' selection of a target number of counseling sessions. During an online survey, adult tobacco users (N = 93) were randomized to one of two groups that determined the answer choices they saw in response to a question assessing their interest in multi-session cessation counseling. Group A choose between two sessions or a "target" of five sessions. Group B was given a third "decoy" option of seven sessions. Binary logistic regression was used to compare groups on the proportion of participants selecting the "target."

resultsAmong 90 participants with complete data, a decoy effect was not found. There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of participants selecting the target of five sessions (47% in Group B vs. 53% in Group A; aOR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.48-1.19). Trial Registration This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 13, 2019 (NCT04200157).

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultCounselingFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCounselingSmokingSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID31898550
PMCPMC6941248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.