Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898546›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Assessing quality of life in older adults: psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire in a nursing home population.

Gørill Haugan, Jorunn Drageset, Beate André, Kamile Kukulu, James Mugisha, Britt Karin S Utvær

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the OPQOL-Brief.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gørill HauganNTNU Center for health promotion research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. gorill.haugan@nord.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-6462
Jorunn DragesetFaculty of Health and Social Science, Western University of Applied Science, Bergen, Norway.
Beate AndréNTNU Center for health promotion research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kamile KukuluFaculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
James MugishaSocial Worker, Kyambogo University and Butabika National Referral and Teaching Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Britt Karin S UtværDepartment of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 238331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWell-adapted and validated quality-of-life measurement models for the nursing home population are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the psychometrical properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire among cognitively intact nursing home residents. The research question addressed evidence related to the dimensionality, reliability and construct validity, all of which considered interrelated measurement properties.

methodsCross-sectional data were collected during 2017-2018, in 27 nursing homes representing four different Norwegian municipalities, located in Western and Mid-Norway. The total sample comprised 188 of 204 (92% response rate) long-term nursing home residents who met the inclusion criteria: (1) municipality authority's decision of long-term nursing home care; (2) residential time 3 months or longer; (3) informed consent competency recognized by responsible doctor and nurse; and (4) capable of being interviewed.

resultsPrincipal component analysis and confirmative factor analyses indicated a unidimensional solution. Five of the original 13 items showed low reliability and validity; excluding these items revealed a good model fit for the one-dimensional 8-items measurement model, showing good internal consistency and validity for these 8 items.

conclusionFive out of the 13 original items were not high-quality indicators of quality-of-life showing low reliability and validity in this nursing home population. Significant factor loadings, goodness-of-fit indices and significant correlations in the expected directions with the selected constructs (anxiety, depression, self-transcendence, meaning-in-life, nurse-patient interaction, and joy-of-life) supported the psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire. Exploring the essence of quality-of-life when residing in a nursing home is highly warranted, followed by development and validation of new tools assessing quality-of-life in this population. Such knowledge and well-adapted scales for the nursing home population are beneficial and important for the further development of care quality in nursing homes, and consequently for quality-of-life and wellbeing in this population.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNorwayPrincipal Component AnalysisPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFactor analysisNursing home careNursing home residentsOPQoL-brief questionnairePsychometric propertiesQuality of lifeWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID31898546
PMCPMC6941243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.