Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898533›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Women's experiences of midwifery care immediately before and after caesarean section deliveries at a public Hospital in the Western Region of Ghana.

Agani Afaya, Veronica Millicent Dzomeku, Elizabeth A Baku, Richard Adongo Afaya, Mavis Ofori, Samuel Agyeibi, Frederick Boateng, Rosemond Ohwui Gamor, Elsie Gyasi-Kwofie, Prudence P Mwini Nyaledzigbor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agani AfayaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana. aagani@uhas.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-2999
Veronica Millicent DzomekuDepartment of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Elizabeth A BakuSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Richard Adongo AfayaDepartment of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Mavis OforiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Samuel AgyeibiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Frederick BoatengSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Rosemond Ohwui GamorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Elsie Gyasi-KwofieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Prudence P Mwini NyaledzigborSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
University of Health and Allied Sciences · GHKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildbirth remains a uniquely multifaceted, mental-cognitive and a major life experience to women. It is composed of a variety of psycho social and emotional aspects and creates memories, sometimes bad experiences and unmet expectations which leaves the mother with lasting scars. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring post-caesarean section delivered mothers experiences of midwifery care in a public hospital in Ghana.

methodsThis descriptive exploratory qualitative research used an interpretative approach to explore mothers' experiences of midwifery care immediately before and after caesarean section (CS). The study employed a purposive sampling technique in recruiting 22 participants who had knowledge of the phenomenon under study. Data collection was guided by an interview guide, which involved face to face individual interviews and focus group discussion at the postnatal ward and clinic. All interviews were audio-recorded and lasted 30-40 min. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic data analysis employed.

resultsFour major themes emerged from the analysis of participants' transcripts: Support by Midwives (physical and psychological, and attitude towards patients' pain management); Protection of mothers (provision of privacy, confidentiality and physical environment); Provision of information/communication (before caesarean section, and before a minor task) and midwives' attitude (attitude towards delivery care).

conclusionMothers delivered by caesarean section had varied experiences of midwifery care which were both positive and negative ones. Provision of psychological support and adequate pain management were positive experiences. The challenges experienced were related to provision of information, privacy, and physical support. Participants, who underwent emergency CS in particular, were dissatisfied with the provision of information concerning the surgical procedure. Provision of privacy and physical support were also issues of great concern. We therefore, recommend supportive and sensitive midwifery care particularly for mothers undergoing emergency CS. Documenting women's diverse experiences of midwifery care before and after CS delivery is important to healthcare providers, hospital managers and policy makers as the feedback garnered can be used to improve maternity services and inform decisions on midwifery care.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHospitals, PublicHumansMidwiferyMothersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionPerinatal CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchCaesarean sectionMidwifeMidwifery careMothers delivery experience

Identifiers

PMID31898533
PMCPMC6941249
OpenAlexW3001262411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.