Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898510›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Protocol for the Process Evaluation of the Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) randomized controlled trial for children and young people.

K Khan, C Hollis, C L Hall, E B Davies, D Mataix-Cols, P Andrén, T Murphy, B J Brown, E Murray, C Glazebrook

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03483493 (Therapist-guided, Parent-assisted Remote Digital Behavioural Intervention for Tics in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03483493 nacompletednot on this map

Therapist-guided, Parent-assisted Remote Digital Behavioural Intervention for Tics in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: an Internal Pilot Study and Single-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS TrustRan2018 to 2021Enrolled224ConditionsTic Disorders, Tourette SyndromeArmsExposure Response Prevention for tics, Psychoeducation for tics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

K KhanDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. kareem.khan@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-2827
C HollisDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
C L HallDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
E B DaviesDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
D Mataix-ColsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
P AndrénDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
T MurphyTic Disorder Clinic, Psychological Medicine Team, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
B J BrownNIHR MindTech Medtech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
E MurrayResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
C GlazebrookDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 16/19/02Department of Health HTA/16/19/02Health Technology Assessment Programme 16/19/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcess evaluations are an important component in the interpretation and understanding of outcomes in trials. The Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an Internet-delivered behavioural intervention (called BIP TIC) compared to an Internet-delivered education programme aimed at children and young people with tics. A process evaluation will be undertaken alongside the main trial to determine precisely how the behavioural intervention works and ascertain whether, and if so, how, the intervention could be successfully implemented in standard clinical practice. This protocol paper describes the rationale, aims, and methodology of the ORBIT trial process evaluation.

methodsThe process evaluation will have a mixed-methods design following the UK Medical Research Council 2015 guidelines, comprising both quantitative and qualitative data collection. This will include analysing data usage of participants in the intervention arm; purposively sampled, semi-structured interviews of parents and children, therapists and supervisors, and referring clinicians of the ORBIT trial, as well as analysis of qualitative comments put into the online therapy platform by participants at the end of treatment. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated in a triangulation approach, to provide an understanding of how the intervention works, and what resources are needed for effective implementation, uptake and use in routine clinical care. DISCUSSION: This process evaluation will explore the experiences of participants, therapists and supervisors and referring clinicians of a complex online intervention. By contextualising trial efficacy results, this will help understand how and if the intervention worked and what may be required to sustain the implementation of the treatment long term. The findings will also aid in our understanding of factors that can affect the success of complex interventions. This will enable future researchers developing online behavioural interventions for children and young people with mental health and neurological disorders to gain invaluable information from this process evaluation.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number, ISRCTN70758207. Registered on 20 March 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03483493. Registered on 30 March 2018.

Indexed as

InternetQuality of LifeAdolescentChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTicsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultChildren and young peopleComplex interventionMixed methodsProcess evaluationProtocolRandomized controlled trialTicsTourette’s

Identifiers

PMID31898510
PMCPMC6941346
OpenAlexW2999232792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.