Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898496›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2020

Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Louis Bernard, René Ecochard, François Gueyffier, Laurent Letrilliart

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis BernardUniv. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008, Lyon, France.
René EcochardHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Lyon, France.
François GueyffierUMR5558, service de pharmacologie et toxicologie, faculté Laennec, Lyon, France.
Laurent LetrilliartUniv. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008, Lyon, France. laurent.letrilliart@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6802-7002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare goals are often implicit, although their identification is a key element of any prescription process. This study aimed to describe the clinical goals of drug prescriptions in general practice, their determinants and the agreement between physicians and patients.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted by 11 resident trainees acting as observers in 23 general practices. The residents recorded the indication and main physician's goal for all drugs prescribed during five consultation days in each practice in December 2015, and the main patient's goal for a sub-sample of consultations. We used an eight-category generic classification of prescription goals, including three specific (mortality, morbidity and cure), three non-specific (symptoms, quality of life, functioning) and two non-specified (other goal, no goal) categories. Analyses were based on a multivariable, multilevel model and on the kappa statistic applied to the sub-sample of consultations.

resultsThe sample encompassed 2141 consultations and 5036 drugs. The main physicians' goal of drug prescriptions was to relieve symptoms (43.3%). The other goals were to decrease the risk of morbidity (22.4%), to cure disease (11.7%), to improve quality of life (10.6%), to decrease the risk of mortality (8.5%) and to improve functioning (1.8%). The choice of a specific goal was more frequent in patients with the following characteristics: over 50 (OR [1.09;1.15]), of male gender (OR [1.09;1.39]), with full financial coverage for a long-term condition (OR [1.47;1.97]), known by the physician (OR [1.19;2.23]), or with a somatic health problem (OR [2.56;4.17]). Cohen's kappa for drug prescription goals between the patients and the physicians was 0.26 (0.23-0.30).

conclusionsPhysicians' goals are poorly shared with patients. It remains to be assessed whether it is possible to collect and discuss information on prescription goals on a daily basis.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedDrug prescriptionGeneral practiceGoalsObservational studyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31898496
PMCPMC6941394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.