Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898476›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon.

Ines B Moura, Charmaine Normington, Duncan Ewin, Emma Clark, Mark H Wilcox, Anthony M Buckley, Caroline H Chilton

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comprehensive Evaluation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ines B MouraLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. i.b.moura@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-7196
Charmaine NormingtonLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Duncan EwinLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Emma ClarkLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mark H WilcoxLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anthony M BuckleyLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Caroline H ChiltonLeeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

Leeds Cares (GB) 3R02 _93Rosetrees Trust A1332Seres Therapeutics Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high recurrent infection rate. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used successfully to treat recurrent CDI, but much remains unknown about the human gut microbiota response to replacement therapies. In this study, antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis of gut microbiota and bacterial growth dynamics were investigated by two quantitative methods: real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and direct culture enumeration, in triple-stage chemostat models of the human colon. Three in vitro models were exposed to clindamycin to induce simulated CDI. All models were treated with vancomycin, and two received an FMT. Populations of total bacteria, Bacteroides spp., Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., C. difficile, and Enterobacteriaceae were monitored using both methods. Total clostridia were monitored by selective culture. Using qPCR analysis, we additionally monitored populations of Prevotella spp., Clostridium coccoides group, and Clostridium leptum group.

resultsBoth methods showed an exacerbation of disruption of the colonic microbiota following vancomycin (and earlier clindamycin) exposure, and a quicker recovery (within 4 days) of the bacterial populations in the models that received the FMT. C. difficile proliferation, consistent with CDI, was also observed by both qPCR and culture. Pearson correlation coefficient showed an association between results varying from 98% for Bacteroides spp., to 62% for Enterobacteriaceae.

conclusionsGenerally, a good correlation was observed between qPCR and bacterial culture. Overall, the molecular assays offer results in real-time, important for treatment efficacy, and allow the monitoring of additional microbiota groups. However, individual quantification of some genera (e.g. clostridia) might not be possible without selective culture.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesClindamycinClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsColonFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMicrobial ViabilityModels, BiologicalPhylogenyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinVancomycinBacterial cultureC. difficileChemostat gut modelFMTReal-time quantitative PCR

Identifiers

PMID31898476
PMCPMC6941270
OpenAlexW3000183574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.