Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898281›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2020

Does the Cerebellum Implement or Select Geometries? A Speculative Note.

Christophe Habas, Alain Berthoz, Tamar Flash, Daniel Bennequin

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christophe HabasService de NeuroImagerie, CHNO des 15-20, Paris, France. chabas@15-20.fr.
Alain BerthozCentre Interdisciplinaire de Biologie (CIRB), Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005, Paris, France.
Tamar FlashDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Daniel BennequinGéométrie et Dynamique, UMR 7586 CNRS-Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During evolution, living systems, actively interacting with their environment, developed the ability, through sensorimotor contingencies, to construct functional spaces shaping their perception and their movements. These geometries were modularly embedded in specific functional neuro-architectures. In particular, human movements were shown to obey several empirical laws, such as the 2/3 power law, isochrony, or jerk minimization principles, which constrain and adapt motor planning and execution. Outstandingly, such laws can be deduced from a combination of Euclidean, affine, and equi-affine geometries, whose neural correlates have been partly detected in several brain areas including the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. Reviving Pellionisz and Llinas general hypothesis regarding the cerebrum and the cerebellum as geometric machines, we speculate that the cerebellum should be involved in implementing and/or selecting task-specific geometries for motor and cognitive skills. More precisely, the cerebellum is assumed to compute forward internal models to help specific cortical and subcortical regions to select appropriate geometries among, at least, Euclidean and affine geometries. We emphasize that the geometrical role of the cerebellum deserves a renewal of interest, which may provide a better understanding of its specific contributions to motor and associative (cognitive) functions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCerebellumHumansAffineBrainCategoryCerebellumEqui-affineGeometryGroupMovementSensori-motor contingenciesSpaceTimingTopos

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.