ReviewCNS drugs2020
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methylcobalamin protects against liver failure via engaging gasdermin E.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Broad and diverse roles of sphingosine-1-phosphate/sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors in the prostate.iScience · 2024Article
- Safety and Discontinuation Rate of Dimethyl Fumarate (ZadivaJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Recent Progress in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Using Immune Cells as Targets.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Cost-utility analysis of teriflunomide in naïve vs. previously treated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Effects of Orally Administered Cannabidiol on Neuroinflammation and Intestinal Inflammation in the Attenuation of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2022Article
- Anti-inflammatory Therapy by Cholinergic and Purinergic Modulation in Multiple Sclerosis Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Molecular neurobiology · 2021Review
- Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapy and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications on the Risk of Infection and Future Vaccination.CNS drugs · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disease-modifying therapies have now become standard treatment for multiple sclerosis. These include five oral therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, namely fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, cladribine, and siponimod, although there is some discrepancy on the relative efficacy and safety of these agents. To gain further insight on these oral agents in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we performed a narrative review of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, cladribine, and siponimod. We limited the analysis to randomized clinical studies in which a comparator was used (i.e., placebo or other disease-modifying therapy). As relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic disease and treatment is lifelong, long-term outcomes were an additional focus. A total of 37 studies met inclusion criteria: 15 for fingolimod, 8 for dimethyl fumarate, 7 for teriflunomide, 4 for cladribine, and 3 for siponimod. All drugs showed some functional and magnetic resonance imaging benefit in nearly all clinical studies. The reduction in annual relapse rate was similar for fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and cladribine, and somewhat greater than for teriflunomide; there is limited information on the annual relapse rate for siponimod. For all drugs, the benefits reported at short follow-up times are broadly consistent with those seen at longer follow-up times. For fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate, there was a definite trend towards a progressively lower annual relapse rate with continuing treatment. The safety profile of all five drugs was considered to be acceptable, even after extended treatment. While these results should be treated with caution, they highlight that future head-to-head studies are needed to better understand the long-term benefits of disease-modifying therapies. Such information will be of value when considering the risk-benefit profile of these oral therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.