Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898153›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2020

The Global Educational Toxicology Toolkit (GETKIT): A 1-Day Course for Teaching Poisoning Essentials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): Course Development and Pilot Data Analysis.

Kathryn T Kopec, Rais Vohra, Cynthia Santos, Ziad Kazzi, Anselm Wong

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Importance of Continuing Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Global Educational Toxicology Uniting Project (GETUP).Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn T KopecCarolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. ktkopec@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0991-2730
Rais VohraCalifornia Poison Control System and UCSF Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA, USA.
Cynthia SantosRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ziad KazziEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anselm WongVictorian Poisons Information Centre and Austin Toxicology Service, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorldwide an estimated one million deaths occur annually as a result of poisoning. Internationally there is a lack of toxicology training programs, especially in resource poor settings. We developed a one-day, interactive toxicology curriculum for healthcare practitioners in countries lacking clinical toxicology training and evaluated its feasibility and effectiveness for knowledge dissemination.

methodsGETKIT was developed with 3 sections: didactics, hands on toxicology case lab, and technology clinic. The investigators, who are medical toxicologists,created 23 didactic lectures and 42 workshop cases. All materials were peer reviewed by 5 senior medical toxicologists for content validity. Participants atpilot sites were given pre-course, post-course, and 3-month follow-up tests and surveys.

resultsGETKIT was delivered internationally at 7 sites between November 2017 and April 2018. There were 186 total participants. One hundred and ten participants (59%) reported their hospital lacked a clinical toxicology service. The median post course score 12 (60%), IQR (6,14) was significantly higher compared to the pre-course score 9 (45%), IQR (6,11) (p < 0.0001). There was a significantly higher median 3-month post course score 13 (65%), IQR (8,14) vs. a median pre course score of 9 (45%), IQR (6,11) (p 0.0005). At 3-month follow up 86% of participants reported GETKIT had changed their clinical practice.

conclusionsAn improvement in and retention of medical toxicology knowledge was demonstrated with the GETKIT course. It also conferred improvement in selfreportedpoisoning management practices in participants from low resource settings.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGlobal HealthPoisoningCurriculumEducational MeasurementFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansIncomePilot ProjectsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesToxicologyGlobal healthInternational toxicologyToxicology education

Identifiers

PMID31898153
PMCPMC7320081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.