Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898030›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2020

The prebiotic potential of brewers' spent grain on livestock's health: a review.

Emanuel Joel Lao, Noel Dimoso, Jofrey Raymond, Ernest Rashid Mbega

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Conversion of brewers' spent grain into proteinaceous animal feed using solid state fermentation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Screening and Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuel Joel LaoDepartment of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania. laoemanueljoel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-1987
Noel DimosoCentre for Research, Agriculture Advancement, Teaching Excellence and Sustainability (CREATES), The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.
Jofrey RaymondDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Nutritional Sciences, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.
Ernest Rashid MbegaDepartment of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing interest from the feed as a source of energy towards specific nutrient-yielding compounds in feeds is amongst the latest developments from scientific and industrial communities. Apart from brewers' spent grain (BSG) being relatively inexpensive feed source, nutritious with high crude protein and minerals, recent studies have explored its potential as a source of prebiotics. Prebiotics are certain feeds that are comprised of non-digestive polysaccharides that can be fed to animals and modulate the balance and activities of microbial populations in the gut. The BSG contains arabinoxylans and β-glucans whereby when consumed by animals, they promote the activity of beneficial bacteria particularly species from three genera of Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus. The increased degradation of fibrous feed accelerates the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) which serve as the primary energy sources for the anaerobic microbes. This elevated concentration of SCFA stimulates numerous physio-biological functions which include intestinal nutrients absorption, glucose balance, improvement of immunity, lipid metabolism, and suppression of pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli. To capitalize on the prebiotic potential of BSG, certain considerations need to be well taken care of and these include possible microbial dysfunctions such as rumen acidosis, different responses rates of animals due to variations in health status, age, and species as well as feed safety issues especially mycotoxin contamination which can jeopardize its inherited prebiotic benefits.

Indexed as

PrebioticsAnimalsBeerCattleDistillationEdible GrainFermentationWaste ProductsPrebioticsWaste ProductsAnimal healthArabinoxylansBrewers’ spent grain (BSG)gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Non-digestible oligosaccharidesPrebioticsRumen microbiotaShort-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)

Identifiers

PMID31898030
OpenAlexW2996839667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.