Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31898022›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2020

Camelids: new players in the international animal production context.

Mousa Zarrin, José L Riveros, Amir Ahmadpour, André M de Almeida, Gaukhar Konuspayeva, Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Bernard Faye, Lorenzo E Hernández-Castellano

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seroprevalence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Mousa ZarrinDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, 75918-74831, Iran.
José L RiverosDepartamento de Ciencias Animales, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436, Santiago, Chile.
Amir AhmadpourDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, 75918-74831, Iran.
André M de AlmeidaLinking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal.
Gaukhar KonuspayevaDepartment of Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 050040.
Einar Vargas-Bello-PérezDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Bernard FayeUMR SELMET, CIRAD-ES, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398, Montpellier cedex, France.
Lorenzo E Hernández-CastellanoDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Postboks 50, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. lhc@anis.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2729-0434
Aarhus University · DKAl-Farabi Kazakh National University · KZCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Lisbon · PTUtah State University · USYasouj University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Camelidae family comprises the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus), the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius), and four species of South American camelids: llama (Lama glama), alpaca (Lama pacos) guanaco (Lama guanicoe), and vicuña (Vicugna vicugna). The main characteristic of these species is their ability to cope with either hard climatic conditions like those found in arid regions (Bactrian and dromedary camels) or high-altitude landscapes like those found in South America (South American camelids). Because of such interesting physiological and adaptive traits, the interest for these animals as livestock species has increased considerably over the last years. In general, the main animal products obtained from these animals are meat, milk, and hair fiber, although they are also used for races and work among other activities. In the near future, climate change will likely decrease agricultural areas for animal production worldwide, particularly in the tropics and subtropics where competition with crops for human consumption is a major problem already. In such conditions, extensive animal production could be limited in some extent to semi-arid rangelands, subjected to periodical draughts and erratic patterns of rainfall, severely affecting conventional livestock production, namely cattle and sheep. In the tropics and subtropics, camelids may become an important protein source for humans. This article aims to review some of the recent literature about the meat, milk, and hair fiber production in the six existing camelid species highlighting their benefits and drawbacks, overall contributing to the development of camelid production in the framework of food security.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryInternationalityAnimalsCamelidaeHumansBactrian camelDromedary camelHair fiberMeatMilkSouth American camelids

Identifiers

PMID31898022
OpenAlexW2997408933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.