Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897870›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

Operation performance and microbial community of sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification sludge with different sulfur sources.

Caixia Fu, Ji Li, Xiaomei Lv, Wei Song, Xiaolei Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caixia FuSchool of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China.
Ji LiSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Water Resource Application and Environmental Pollution Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), E202, HIT Campus Shenzhen University Town Xili, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiaomei LvSchool of Environment and Civil Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, 523808, Guangdong, China.
Wei SongSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Water Resource Application and Environmental Pollution Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), E202, HIT Campus Shenzhen University Town Xili, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiaolei ZhangSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Water Resource Application and Environmental Pollution Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), E202, HIT Campus Shenzhen University Town Xili, Shenzhen, 518055, China. xiaolei.zhang2016@foxmail.com.
Harbin Institute of Technology · CNDongguan University of Technology · CN

Funding

Major Project of National Water Pollution Control and Governance of Science and Technology 2017ZX07401001Shenzhen Demonstration Project KJYY20171012140149523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operation performance and bacterial community structure of sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (SAD) based on different sulfur sources served as electron donor was first parallelly compared among three sequencing batch reactors. Sulfur and sodium thiosulfate systems achieved similar operation performance and were superior to that of sodium sulfide. When the influent NO

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAutotrophic ProcessesBioreactorsDenitrificationNitratesSewageSulfidesSulfurThiosulfatesNitratesSewagesodium sulfidesodium thiosulfateSulfidesSulfurThiosulfatesCommunity structureDenitrification performanceDifferent sulfur sourcesFunctional microorganismsSulfur-based autotrophic denitrification

Identifiers

PMID31897870
OpenAlexW2997455800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.