Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897843›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

The pitfalls and promise of liquid biopsies for diagnosing and treating solid tumors in children: a review.

Ruben Van Paemel, Roos Vlug, Katleen De Preter, Nadine Van Roy, Frank Speleman, Leen Willems, Tim Lammens, Geneviève Laureys, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Godelieve A M Tytgat and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sequential Analysis of cfDNA Reveals Clonal Evolution in Patients with Neuroblastoma Receiving ALK-Targeted Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Circulating Tumor DNA in Pediatric Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruben Van PaemelCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Roos VlugDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Katleen De PreterCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Nadine Van RoyCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank SpelemanCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Leen WillemsDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Tim LammensCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Geneviève LaureysCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Gudrun SchleiermacherINSERM U830, Laboratoire de Genetique et Biologie des Cancers, Research Center, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Godelieve A M TytgatPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kathy AstrahantseffDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hedwig DeubzerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bram De WildeCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Bram.DeWilde@uzgent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-1322
Ghent University Hospital · BEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInserm · FRPrincess Máxima Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free DNA profiling using patient blood is emerging as a non-invasive complementary technique for cancer genomic characterization. Since these liquid biopsies will soon be integrated into clinical trial protocols for pediatric cancer treatment, clinicians should be informed about potential applications and advantages but also weaknesses and potential pitfalls. Small retrospective studies comparing genetic alterations detected in liquid biopsies with tumor biopsies for pediatric solid tumor types are encouraging. Molecular detection of tumor markers in cell-free DNA could be used for earlier therapy response monitoring and residual disease detection as well as enabling detection of pathognomonic and therapeutically relevant genomic alterations.Conclusion: Existing analyses of liquid biopsies from children with solid tumors increasingly suggest a potential relevance for molecular diagnostics, prognostic assessment, and therapeutic decision-making. Gaps remain in the types of tumors studied and value of detection methods applied. Here we review the current stand of liquid biopsy studies for pediatric solid tumors with a dedicated focus on cell-free DNA analysis. There is legitimate hope that integrating fully validated liquid biopsy-based innovations into the standard of care will advance patient monitoring and personalized treatment of children battling solid cancers.What is Known:• Liquid biopsies are finding their way into routine oncological screening, diagnosis, and disease monitoring in adult cancer types fast.• The most widely adopted source for liquid biopsies is blood although other easily accessible body fluids, such as saliva, pleural effusions, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can also serve as sources for liquid biopsiesWhat is New:• Retrospective proof-of-concept studies in small cohorts illustrate that liquid biopsies in pediatric solid tumors yield tremendous potential to be used in diagnostics, for therapy response monitoring and in residual disease detection.• Liquid biopsy diagnostics could tackle some long-standing issues in the pediatric oncology field; they can enable accurate genetic diagnostics in previously unbiopsied tumor types like renal tumors or brain stem tumors leading to better treatment strategies.

Indexed as

ChildFemaleForecastingHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMedical OncologyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsNeuroblastomaPediatricsSurvival AnalysisWilms TumorCell-free DNA profilingLiquid biopsiesPediatric solid tumors

Identifiers

PMID31897843
PMCPMC6971142
OpenAlexW2997872294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.