ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2020
Use of FEF25-75% to Guide IgG Dosing to Protect Pulmonary Function in CVID.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) can protect against lung function decline in CVID. We tested whether increasing IgG dosage was beneficial in patients who exhibited a decline in forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) even though they were receiving IgG doses within the therapeutic range. Of 189 CVID patients seen over 12 years, 38 patients met inclusion criteria, were seen on ≥ 3 visits, and demonstrated a ≥ 10% decrease in FEF25-75% from visits 1 to 2. FEF25-75%, forced expiratory flow at 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC at visit 3 were compared among those with non-dose adjustment (non-DA) versus additional IgG dose adjustment (DA). Three FEF25-75% tiers were identified: top (> 80% predicted), middle (50-80%), and bottom (< 50%). DA and non-DA groups did not differ in clinical infections or bronchodilator use, although the non-DA group tended to use more antibiotics. In the top, normal tier, FEF25-75% increased in DA, but the change did not achieve statistical significance. In the middle moderate obstruction tier, visit 3 FEF25-75% increased among DA but not non-DA sets (11.8 ± 12.4%, p = 0.003 vs. 0.3 ± 9.9%, p = 0.94). Improvement in FEV1/FVC at visit 3 was also significant among DA vs. non-DA (7.2 ± 12.4%, p = 0.04 vs. - 0.2 ± 2.7%, p = 0.85). In the bottom, severe tier, FEF25-75% was unchanged in DA (- 0.5 ± 5.2%, p = 0.79), but increased in non-DA (5.1 ± 5.2%, p = 0.02). Among IGRT CVID patients with moderate but not severe obstruction as assessed by spirometry, increasing IgG dosage led to an increase in FEF25-75% and FEV1/FVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.